透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.37.68
  • 期刊

新產品開發決策之同步SMART^2評價模式

A Concurrent SMART^2 Evaluation Model for Decision-making in New Product Development

摘要


The planning and design (P&D) phase is most critical to project success in new product development (NPD). When selecting an appropriate P&D alternative which involves a variety of considerations such as corporate strategy, finance, marketing, technology, production, customer need, product aesthetics, and so forth, most company's high-level management lack the ability to evaluate the candidates effectively. Substandard NPD project is often a direct result of inadequate decision-maker selection. In this paper, we propose a concurrent SMART^2 evaluation model of NPD design alternatives using the bi-directional Analytic Network Process (ANP). It is utilized to determine the local weights of these candidates from both planning and design dimensions. Following the above evaluation model, a Gradient Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) is employed to calculate the overall weights and a mathematical Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP) is built to incorporate multiple objectives in order to reach an optimum solution. A NPD design case is presented to illustrate the overall decision procedure and to examine the effectiveness of our proposed model. The result shows that the local weights of alternatives in the planning aspect are C (0.365) > B (0.273) > A (0.257) > D (0.105) while those in the design aspect are A (0.299) > C (0.237) > B (0.283) > D (0.181). Furthermore, the priority of alternatives in the largest of the three decision areas (C > A > B > D) identified by GSA is around 66.5% (20.5%-87%). Finally, a 50-50 proportion in planning and design dimensions is applied as a simulation point to demonstrate the final optimal solution-design alternatives A and C.

並列摘要


The planning and design (P&D) phase is most critical to project success in new product development (NPD). When selecting an appropriate P&D alternative which involves a variety of considerations such as corporate strategy, finance, marketing, technology, production, customer need, product aesthetics, and so forth, most company's high-level management lack the ability to evaluate the candidates effectively. Substandard NPD project is often a direct result of inadequate decision-maker selection. In this paper, we propose a concurrent SMART^2 evaluation model of NPD design alternatives using the bi-directional Analytic Network Process (ANP). It is utilized to determine the local weights of these candidates from both planning and design dimensions. Following the above evaluation model, a Gradient Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) is employed to calculate the overall weights and a mathematical Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP) is built to incorporate multiple objectives in order to reach an optimum solution. A NPD design case is presented to illustrate the overall decision procedure and to examine the effectiveness of our proposed model. The result shows that the local weights of alternatives in the planning aspect are C (0.365) > B (0.273) > A (0.257) > D (0.105) while those in the design aspect are A (0.299) > C (0.237) > B (0.283) > D (0.181). Furthermore, the priority of alternatives in the largest of the three decision areas (C > A > B > D) identified by GSA is around 66.5% (20.5%-87%). Finally, a 50-50 proportion in planning and design dimensions is applied as a simulation point to demonstrate the final optimal solution-design alternatives A and C.

參考文獻


呂清夫(2003)。造形原理。台北:雄獅圖書。
胡佑宗譯(1996)。工業設計:產品造形的歷史、理論及實務。台北:亞太圖書。
許志義(2003)。多目標決策。台北:五南圖書。
曾懷恩、李榮貴(1998)。以AHP模式作爲評估設計案的決策方法。設計學報。3(1),43-54。
蔡子瑋(1994)。產品意象語言研究-以本土意象爲例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。

被引用紀錄


何瑜婷(2009)。新產品開發企劃對於產品設計師在構想發展之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2009.00182
朱國安(2007)。導入品牌策略於新產品開發流程之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0006-2107200714323200
李彥毅(2009)。情感導引模式運用於產品造型表現之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315171333

延伸閱讀