透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.93.73
  • 期刊

The Effects of Individual Spatial Cognitive Styles and Spatial Stimulus-Response Pairing Patterns on Choice Reaction Time

空間認知風格與空間刺激反應配對形式對選擇反應作業績效之影響

摘要


本研究之目的,旨在探討空間認知個別化差異與空間刺激反應配對形式差異,對現代化控制室之空間刺激反應作業反應績效之影響。本研究之實驗採用2(空間認知風格)×2(空間刺激反應配對形式)之split-plot設計。空間認知個別化差異,以Riding設計之電腦化Cognitive Styles Analysis (CSA)測驗所判定之場地獨立(field-independent)與場地依賴 (field-dependent)等兩空間認知風格定義之。而空間刺激反應配對形式,以一致性刺激反應配對作業與非一致性刺激反應配對作業定義之。實驗結果顯示,空間認知風格與空間刺激反應配對形式等兩實驗變數,對受測者之作業反應績效均產生影響。其中,場地依賴認知風格者,受空間反應刺激配對作業形式差異之影響,要比場地獨立認知風格者所受的影響來得大。此顯示,空間認知形式不同者,在空間刺激反應作業中會有不同的作業績效表現。因此,建議應審慎評估,挑選操作現代化控制室之空間刺激反應配對作業的操作人員。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of both individual spatial cognitive styles and spatial stimulus-response (S-R) patterns on average choice reaction time. The experiment employed a 2 (individual spatial cognitive styles) ×2 (spatial S-R pairing patterns) split-plot design. The individual spatial cognitive styles used field-dependent-independent (FDI) cognitive styles that were tested with Riding's computer-administered Cognitive Styles Analysis (CSA). The spatial S-R pairing patterns used correspondent spatial S-R pairing task and non-correspondent spatial S-R pairing task. Analysis of variance showed that both individual spatial cognitive styles and spatial S-R pairing patterns were significant. Further, it was found that the difference in the FD participants' performances between the two different spatial S-R pairing pattern tasks varied more significantly than the difference in the FI participants' performances (the FD participants performed significantly more slowly than the FI participants in the non-correspondent spatial S-R pairing task than in the correspondent spatial S-R pairing task). This indicates that spatial-cognitive individuals performed differently in different spatial S-R pairing pattern tasks, and demonstrates the important role of selecting operator for spatial S-R pairing tasks, especially in the advanced control room.

參考文獻


Alm, I.(2003).Designing interactive interfaces: Theoretical consideration of the complexity of standards and guidelines, and the difference between evolving and formalized systems.Interacting with Computers.15(1),109-119.
Bayerl, J.,Millen, D.,Lewis, S.(1988).Consistent layout of function keys and screen labels speeds user responses.Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting.(Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting).:
Chapanis, A.,Lindenbaum, L.(1959).A reaction time study of four control-display linkages.Human Factors.1(1),1-7.
Fitts, P. M.,Seeger, C. M.(1953).S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology.46(3),199-210.
Ray, R. D.,Ray, W. D.(1979).An analysis of domestic cooker control design.Ergonomics.22(4),1243-1248.

延伸閱讀