台北巿國高中（職）學生「兩性平等教育」評量之橫斷性研究

A cross-section analysis on Gender Equality Education among Middle school students in Taipei City

高松景(Son-ji Gau) ； 武靜蕙(Jing-hwei Wu) ； 晏涵文(Han-wen Yen) ； 劉潔心(Chieh-wen Liu) ； 虞順光(Shun-kuang Yu)

《台灣性學學刊》 9卷2期 (2003/09) Pp. 37-61

https://doi.org/10.6784/FJS.200309.0037

摘要

本研究旨在針對台北巿國、高中（職）學生在「兩性平等教育」評量結果進行橫斷性分析，探討從國中一年級到高中（職）三年級男女學生應加強的教育重點，做為教育行政及學校行政持續推動「兩性平等教育」之參考。研究的母群體是台北巿公私立國、高中（職）學生，經分層隨機抽樣，總樣本數共3,220人（國中1260人，高中職1597人）。研究工具採自編結構問卷，內容有兩性「自我瞭解、人我關係與自我突破」的覺察度、知識、態度、行為與意向、自我效能及基本資料等六個部份，以二因子多變項變異數分析，重要研究結果如下：
1.「兩性交往迷思」及「兩性不平等」的覺察度隨年級升高而增加，女生的覺察度高於男生。
2.「生殖生理」、「性病」、「性騷擾與性侵害」及「兩性權益法令」知識在國中階段：隨年級升高而得分增加；然而在高中階段：則呈現高一急速下降，高二趨緩的現象，整體知識女生優於男生。
3.國中生較高中生「自尊」高，「性別角色態度」以女生較男生正向，其中有關「兩性職業興趣與工作」性別角色態度，隨年級升高漸趨彈性；「兩性互動」性別角色態度，則國中生較高中生具彈性。
4.兩性交往相關行為隨年級升高比率漸增，「性別角色行為意向」呈現性別差異。5.自我效能以女生較男生有把握，然而年級的差異只有在「拒絕技巧與自我調適」的自我效能上，男生達顯著差異。
6.年級、性別與各依變項間均呈顯著交互作用。依據研究結果提出「兩性平等教育」推展之建議。

關鍵字

兩性平等教育 ； 性別角色態度

並列摘要

This study was designed to assess the middle school students’ performance in Gender Equality Education Curriculum with cross-section analysis methods. The purpose was to explore the educational emphasis among the students from Grade one of junior high school to Grade 3 of high school. By stratified sampling, there were 3,220 subjects participating in this study (1,260 students from junior high schools, 1,597 students from high schools and vocational school).
Data were collected with a questionnaire, which contained six main dimensions–the awareness of students’ self-understanding, interpersonal relationship and self-breakthrough, the knowledge, the attitude, the behavior and intention, and the self-efficacy. By two way MANOVA statistics analysis, the important findings were as follows:
1. The awareness of girl students was better than the boy students. The higher the grades were, the more increased the awareness was on the item of (Boy-girl Contact Myth) and (Gender Inequality).
2. The knowledge of girl students was better than the boy students, in junior high school. The higher the grades were, the better knowledge they had, but it decreased rapidly in the high school among grade one students and slower during grade two.
3. Girl students were better than the boy students on the item of gender-role attitude. It revealed that junior high school students were better than high school (also than vocational school) students on the item of self-esteem.
4. The higher the grades were, the more experience of boy-girl contact they had. The traditional stereotype of the gender role behavior and intention affected these students deeply.
5. The self-efficacy of girl students was better than boy students. It revealed difference among each grade on the item of “ refusal skill and self-adaptation”. There was significant difference among boy students.
6. The variables of sex and age indicated significant interaction among the following variables: the awareness, the knowledge, the attitude, the behavior and intention, and the self-efficacy.
According to the above results, suggestions were made to better develop Gender Equality Education programs.

並列關鍵字

gender equality education ； gender role attitude

參考文獻

李愫平(2001)。青少年自尊與懷孕危機關係之研究－以台北縣市家事職業學校學生爲例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所。

吳佳倩(2000)。中美兩性平等教育政策之比較(碩士論文)。國立暨南大學比較教育研究所。

周麗玉(1999)。兩性平等教育融入九年一貫課程綱要的時代意義。兩性平等教育季刊。6，97-106。

高松景(2000)。建構性教育的教學架構－以人性發展爲基礎。杏陵天地。3，36-39。

高松景、林碧雲、黃淑馨、晏涵文、劉潔心(2002)。台北市國小學生「兩性平等教育」評量研究。台灣性教育協會。8(2)，51-74。