本研究運用後設分析法探究國內性教育教學介入之19篇論文,以效果量、單因子變異數分析及克-瓦二氏單因子等級變異數分析,探討不同性教育教學介入的成效。所得重要結果如下:1.整體而言,性教育教學介入具有:實驗組高於對照組有0.90效果量,在性教育介入成效上,實驗者平均超過對照組81.59%。2.實驗組在性知識、性態度、性行爲意向及自我效能方面均優於控制組。3.近期進行及屬於學位論文性質的性教育教學介入效果量較大;出版年代中以2001-2005年出版的論文效果量較高;出版形式中以學位論文的效果量較高,是否因期刊論文需要經過審查,將非研究介入的誤差、樣本數大小,以及typeⅠerror經過估計加以刪除,而造成較小的ES,值得深思。4.受試者爲國小學生、研究者擔任教學、不對等控制組前後測設計、平均值及標準差之統計方式、及有實際信度的數據,效果量較高。5.教學介入時間愈長及師生面對面教學的性教育教學介入效果量較大。6.不同研究特徵的性教育教學論文在效果上皆沒有顯著差異。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Sexuality Education with the meta-analysis of 19 papers. The data were analyzed by the effect size of meta-analysis, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks. The results of the study were as follow: (1) The average effect size, compared in the experiment and control groups, was .90(superscript σx). The experiment groups who received sexuality education was 81.59% above the mean of the control. (2) The sexuality education program could enhance sex knowledge, attitude, intention of sexual behavior, self-efficacy, especially sex knowledge. (3) Papers published between 2001 and 2005 appeared to have the higher effect size. In terms of subject areas, all achieved significance, except special education. Dissertations also had the higher effect size than other publication forms. (4) The effect size was higher when the subjects were elementary school students and the researchers were practitioners. The pre-test and post-test of non-equivalent control groups, the statistical methods of standard deviations, reliable data and self-designed questionnaires all achieved the higher effect size. (5) The teaching intervention lasting for 5-8 weeks had more favorable effects than 1-4 weeks. Teachers' direct practice also raised the effect size. (6) There was no statistical difference in the effect size between different research characteristics of the sexuality education papers. The results of this study have provided some suggestions for other studies on sexuality education.