透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.201.71
  • 期刊

大學生基本能力指標之建構

Constructing the Indicators of Undergraduate Students' Key Competences

摘要


本研究以系統化的方式,從國內外相關文獻的分析彙整,到大學生基本能力指標問卷之發展和施測,最後以Rasch測量模式分析指標的相對重要性和擁有度,完整呈現大學生基本能力指標之建構歷程。大學生基本能力指標問卷經25位通識教育各領域的學者專家之共識後,歸納出『專業及基礎能力』、『創意與問題解決』、『人際溝通』、『品格與公民素養』、『國際視野』和『自主學習』等六個面向40項指標。問卷施測對象包括116位大學教師、113位產業主管和413位大學生。結果發現,產業主管、大學教師和大學生認為較重要的指標面向為「人際溝通」,當前大學生擁有度較高的指標面向為「品格與公民素養」,而「外語的能力」則是大學生最應具備卻未具備的能力。此外,大學教師和產業主管,以及不同學院的學生對於某些基本能力指標的重要性和擁有度之認知有所不同。未來各大學可參考此模式,發展具學校特色的學生能力指標,以培育社會所需之多元人才。

並列摘要


The study systematically developed the Indicators of Undergraduate Students' Key Competences (IUSKC) as an instrument to investigate the key competences for Taiwanese university students. With a consensus of 25 scholars and experts representing several general education fields, the IUSKC consisted of 40 indices in six dimensions including ”professional and fundamental abilities,” ”creativity and problem solving,” ”interpersonal communication,” ”character and citizenship,” ”global view,” and ”autonomous learning.” The IUSKC questionnaire was administered to 116 professors, 113 business executives and 413 undergraduate students and asked them to evaluate the importance of the key competencies and the extent of these competencies acquired by Taiwan undergraduate students. The Rasch analyses of the data showed that the subjects regarded ”interpersonal communication” as the most important dimension of the index, ”character and citizenship” as a competence possessed by most of Taiwanese undergraduate students,” and ”foreign language” as the most required but wanted competence among Taiwan undergraduates. The business executives, university professors, students from different faculties also demonstrated varied perceptions towards the significance and extent of possession of some indices. The results provided a useful framework for universities/colleges to develop school-specific competence indicators aimed at fostering students' multiple talents demanded by the society.

參考文獻


王保進(2009)。掌握系所評鑑的重點:系所評鑑之精神與認可要素。評鑑雙月刊。21,9-13。
行政院青年輔導委員會()。,未出版。
教育部(2001)。大學教育政策白皮書。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2008)。第二期獎勵大學教學卓越計畫。台北市:教育部。
米澤彰純、許媛翔譯(2009)。學習成效與品質保證:日本高等教育面臨的挑戰。評鑑雙月刊。20,46-48。

被引用紀錄


蔡昕璋(2019)。以PLS-SEM模型探討某大學四年級學生校園參與經驗對全人素養發展之影響學生事務與輔導57(4),12-28。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.201903_57(4).0003
林素吟(2015)。企業識別系統融入自傳教學培養就業力之研究〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2015.00071
高嘉仁(2016)。遊覽車駕駛人職能模式之建立與分析〔博士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.P9840495
陳榮政、姜繼旺(2023)。臺灣高中生全球公民意識的培育與其未來性:以PISA 2018為例中等教育74(4),29-47。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.202312_74(4).0030
王佳琪、鄭英耀、何曉琪(2016)。科學想像力圖形測驗之發展教育科學研究期刊61(4),177-204。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).07

延伸閱讀