透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.216.186.164
  • 期刊

租稅法中裁罰金額及倍數之探討-以稅務違章案件裁罰金額或倍數參考表為中心

The Administrative Penalty of Fines of the Tax Acts-Focus on the Reference Table for Fines and Multiples of Punishments

摘要


國家對人民違反租稅義務之處罰,可施以租稅刑罰或租稅秩序罰。租稅秩序罰中,不論行爲罰或漏稅罰,最常見之處罰種類即爲罰鍰。對於罰鍰之額度,現行稅法帶有應受法定羈束或容許裁量之規定。當有裁量之空間時,稽徵機關究應如何作出最恰當之裁處,並非易事。財政部乃本於其職權發布「稅務違章案件裁罰金額或倍數參考表」,供各稽徵機關於行使其裁量權時,有一客觀之標準可茲參照。惟行政罰法於民國95年施行後,於其第18條亦有關於裁處罰鍰時應審酌因素之規定。而上述裁罰參考表之規定,是否與行政罰法第18條規定相一致,即有探討之必要。本文將先說明租稅秩序罰之基本概念,包括租稅刑罰及租稅秩序罰、行爲罰及漏稅罰等;其次,以租稅法上有關罰鍰規定之態樣及額度爲探討對象;再者,將以行政罰法第18條規定之各種審酌因素爲論究之重點,並及於其與裁罰參考表之關係。然後,再探究裁罰參考表性質及效力,尤其著重在各種審酌因素之整理及歸納,再從事進一涉之檢討,並提出可能之改進建議。最後,則回歸到法院之審查,歸納出法院之立場,以顯現出法院是否確已盡其審查之義務,及須再爲改善之處。

並列摘要


The punishments of violating Tax-Related objections are Tax-Related Penal Punishment and Tax-Related Punishment. On the different kinds of Tax-Related Punishment means, the competent administrative authorities usually take the action of Tax-Related Fines. To the amount of fines, the Tax Acts have the articles of discretion. While the proper amount of fines is always difficult to administrative authorities to decide. The Ministry of Finance in its terms of reference releases the ”Reference Table for Fines and Multiples of Punishments” for the tax authority's discretion in the exercise of its right, for an objective standard can be applied. However, the Administrative Penalty Act come into force and in its article 18 also set up the considerations which shall be given to such factors as the culpability of the act in breach of duty under administrative law. Whether the ”Reference Table for Fines and Multiples of Punishments” above should apply the article 18 or not is the need to explore. This article would like to explain the basic concept of tax penalty, including tax penalties, other acts of punishment, and tax evasion; Secondly, the considerations of article 18 would be discussed, Moreover, we will emphases in a variety of discretionary factors trials and engage in a further review and suggest possible the recommendations for improvement. Finally, we will return to the court's review, summarized the position of a Court order to show up whether the court had done its review of the obligations, and shall be for the Improvement.

參考文獻


洪家殷(2006)。行政罰法論。五南圖書出版有限公司=Wu-Nan Book Inc.=wu nan tu shu chu ban you xian gong si。
陳清秀(2008)。稅法總論。元照出版有限公司=Angle Publishing Co., Ltd.=yuan zhao chu ban you xian gong si。
黃茂榮(2002)。稅法總論。黃茂榮=Huang, Mao-Rrong。
葛克昌(2005)。行政程序與納稅人基本權。葛克昌=Ge, Ke-Chang。
何采蓉(2008)。裁罰基準成稅官怠惰擋箭牌。稅務旬刊。2031

被引用紀錄


林秀荃(2012)。虛設行號影響因素之實證研究-探討違章裁罰倍數參考表修法之影響〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201200298
林靜瑜(2014)。環境罰鍰裁量基準之研究—兼論不法利得之追繳〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.10130
徐振傑(2012)。稅法上解釋函令與信賴保護原則〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613532011
林啟裕(2014)。租稅「漏稅罰」與「行為罰」合憲性之研究-以裁罰態樣及額度為中心-〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613565100
張瑋麟(2016)。推計處罰與正當法律程序關聯之研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614064528

延伸閱讀