對我國志願服務法的若干反思與建議

Reflections and Insights on Regulation of Volunteer Law in Taiwan: Perspectives on Citizens Participation and Civil Society

呂朝賢(Chao-Hsien Leu)

《臺大社會工作學刊》 7期 (2002/12) Pp. 203-241

https://doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr2002.07.04

摘要

本文旨在檢視現行志願服務法的基本框架，並提出反省。本文認為政府志願服務法係由三個森本框架所形塑：(1)．功效框架。(2)．誘因框架。(3)．意義框架。並從政策公正性與實然性等二個原則提出若干研究問題。研究結果顯示，這三個立法框架皆有其侷限性，本文建議政府應：(1)．對志願服務的意義放寬，除強迫性行為外，只要行為本身對社會之貢獻大神個人之投入成本與收益者，皆可視為志願服務行為。(2)．在政策誘因上，應去除教育與服兵役等二項優。忽措施，並著力於志願服務參與平台之建構才是正途。(3)．在功效上，應多強調志願服務的社會貢獻，如：社會資本累積與社會包容的涵養，而非僅著強調其經濟價值而已。

關鍵字

志願服務 ； 志願主義 ； 志工

並列摘要

This paper is a critical analysis of the Volunteering Law. The analysis shows that the Volunteering Law consists of three major components: the functional component, the incentive component, and the meaning component. The criticisms are based on the principle of equality and the principle of realism. By way of presenting the conclusion that each of the three major components is inherently unsound and vulnerable to different defects, the author also suggests the following political implications of this research: First, with respect to the meaning component, we should loosen up the meaning of volunteering, and redefine it in the following manner: all activities, except the coerced ones, are voluntary actions so long as their social benefits exceed the costs and benefits of individual involvements. Secondly, with respect to the incentive component, we should focus on building a good infrastructure of volunteering, instead of providing with the privileged benefits in educational and military services. Thirdly, with regard to the functional component, more emphasis should be laid upon the social dimension of the contribution of volunteering, for instance, that it facilitates the accumulation of social capital and the improvement of social inclusion, than solely upon its mythical economic contribution.

並列關鍵字

Volunteering ； Volunteerism ； Volunteer

參考文獻

立法院(1997)。立法院第三屆第四會期第三次會議。立法院公報（院會紀錄）。86(34)，133。

立法院(2000)。院總第一七八二號：委員提案第二九八二號。立法院公報（院會紀錄）。89(27)，63-75。

立法院(2000)。立法院第四屆第四會期衛生環境及社會福利委員會第十四次全體委員會議紀錄。立法院公報（委員會紀錄）。90(5)，435-467。

立法院(2001)。立法院第四屆第四會期第二十八次會議紀錄。立法院公報（院會紀錄）。90(5)，488-515。

內政部()。