「我們」的選擇、「我們」自己決定：肢體障礙者機構居住與自立生活

本研究回應障礙解放研究典範，從障礙者本人經驗出發，以社會福利權及聯合國身心障礙者權利公約觀點，探討障礙者住「機構」（institution）的經驗。深入訪談13位（曾）住機構肢體障礙者。發現：住機構不是自己的選擇、被安排住進老人長照與啟智機構、受到監視／過一成不變的團體生活、想離開並思考如何離開機構、住機構不是一個選項。政策建議：居住權還給障礙者，邀請障礙者本人參與居住服務規劃，資源支持障礙者社區居住；住機構者可以搬到社區自立生活；立法禁止兒童少年被送進機構。

關鍵字

障礙者；選擇；機構；社區居住；自立生活

並列摘要

Emancipatory disability research paradigm and human rights perspective were employed herein; this study aims to explore disabled people's living experiences in/out of institutions and whether living in an institution is a choice made by disabled people. Regarding the experiences of living in an institution, four main themes emerged: living in an institution is not my choice, living in a nursing home or in an institution for people with intellectual disability, daily life being controlled and under surveillance, and longing for leaving and/or planning to move out of the institution. Moving back to the institution is not a desirable option for the participants. In order to support disabled people, budget and home/community-based services (e.g., homecare and personal assistance) should be extended to meet the needs of disabled people and be endorsed by the laws. The budget could be transferred for those disabled people who move from the institution to live in the community. Living in the community for children and adolescents younger than 20 year-old should be endorsed by the laws.

並列關鍵字

disabled people ； choice ； institution ； living in the community ； independent living

參考文獻

王育瑜（2012）。〈障礙者生活的想像：照顧與社區生活理念及政策探討〉。《聯合勸募論壇》，1，1-24。https://doi.org/10.30082/TUWR.201203.0001 【Wang, Y.-Y. (2012). The view on disabled people’s lives: An analysis of the ideas and policies on care and community living. United Way of Taiwan, 1, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.30082/TUWR.201203.0001】

周月清（2005a）。〈台灣智障者居住服務探討―型態、規模、對象與變遷〉。《臺灣社會工作學刊》，4，34-75。https://doi.org/10.29814/TSW.200507.0002 【Chou, Y.-C. (2005a). Residential services for people with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan: Types, size, users and change. Taiwanese Social Work, 4, 34-75. https://doi.org/10.29814/TSW.200507.0002】

周月清（2005c）。〈發展智能障礙者社區居住與生活：美英兩國探討比較〉。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，9(2)，139-196。https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.200509.0139 【Chou, Y.-C. (2005c). Community living for adults with intellectual disabilities: Comparative study in the US and UK. Social Policy & Social Work, 9(2), 139-196. https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.200509.0139】

周月清、李婉萍、張意才（2007）。〈住民社區居住與生活參與、選擇與自主：以台灣六個團體家庭成年智障者為例〉。《東吳社會工作學報》，16，37-78。https://doi.org/10.29734/SJSW.200706.0002 【Chou, Y.-C., Lee, W.-P., & Chang, I.-T. (2007). Participation, choice and control in community living: Six group homes providing residential services for adults with intellectual disabilities. Soochow Journal of Social Work, 16, 37-78. https://doi.org/10.29734/SJSW.200706.0002】

周月清、陳伯偉、張家寧（2019a）。〈「個人助理是居服的補充包」？地方政府執行身心障礙者自立生活支持／個助服務的迷思與困境〉。《臺灣社會福利學刊》，15(2)，1-56。https://doi.org/10.6265/TJSW.201912_15(2).01 【Chou, Y.-C., Chen, B.-W., & Chang, C.-N. (2019a). “Is personal assistance a supplement to homecare?” Myths and barriers related to the provision of personal assistance by local authorities to people with disabilities. Taiwanese Journal of Social Welfare, 15(2), 1-56. https://doi.org/10.6265/TJSW.201912_15(2).01】

主題瀏覽