想像的系譜(2/3)-論齊梁到初唐文論中的“六朝文學流派”

Imagined Genealogy (2/3): The Discourse of "Schools" and "Genealogy" of literary Theory during Chi-Dynasty to Early Tang Dynasty

祁立峰(Li-Feng Chi)

《東方人文學誌》 7卷4期 (2008/12) Pp. 109-132

https://doi.org/10.6389/OH.200812.0109

摘要

「想像的系譜」是我所歸納的詞彙，用以指稱中國古典文論獨特的「系譜」建構。六朝文論家尤其熱衷於系譜的編撰、流派的歸納、與風格的追本溯源。在相關論文中已討論過鍾嶸的體源論與系譜學，本文乃就六朝至初唐的文論家或史學家所歸納的「六朝文學流派」進行探究。而六朝文史論家如沈約、裴子野、蕭子顯、蕭綱，與初唐文史論家如令狐德棻、李百藥、魏徵、李諤等所理解的「六朝流派的興盛消長，以及作品風格、歷史變遷等面向，之間是否吻合？若有落差，那麼落差背後又隱含什麼觀點與文學立場？也就是說，本文關切的乃是「如何」與「為何」的問題。「文學流派」如何被編撰或被想像，而「文學流派」又是為何被架構被想像。解決「如何」與「為何」的問題，乃是我們理解中國古典文論肌理之路途中，還原創作或理論原貌的可能方式之一。

關鍵字

文學流派 ； 風格歸納 ； 歷史變遷 ； 六朝文論 ； 初唐文論 ； 體源論

並列摘要

I bring up the ”imagined genealogy” which bases on the ”imagined subjectivity” theory. And I already constructed this concept and indicated how pervasive ”Genealogy” in Chinese literature theories. The ”Schools” has beginning prolifically after Six-dynasty. Instead, the ”Schools” of tradition context approaches more and more subjective, haphazard or imagined. In the view of the Chinese literature theories’ author, there're objective and societal. This is what this article questions. This article select and adopt the strategy that ”Discourse of the discourse”, and discourse of sources of styles theory in Six-dynasty and early Tang dynasty from ”Imagined literary Schools”. These articles further differentiate between the ”Imagined Schools” and the ”Style Genealogy”. Based on the statement of explore of Genealogy, I purpose unearth neglected the horizon in the Chinese literature theories' author.

並列關鍵字

Literary Schools ； Literary theory in Six-dynasties ； Literary theory in Early Tang dynasty ； Discourse of Style and Origin