The purpose of this study was to: (1) compare quality of life (QOL) between terminal and non-terminal gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients, (2) understand influencing factors of GI cancer patients' QOL. A cross-sectional design with convenience sampling was used in this study. Structured questionnaires, such as demographic scale, McGill QOL instrument, Pain intensity subscale, Spiritual wellbeing scale, and Social support instrument were chosen to measure study variables. Eighty-seven GI cancer patients (47 terminal and 40 non-terminal) were recruited from five teaching hospitals in the north, middle, and south part of Taiwan. Descriptive analysis and predictive analysis (independent t test, Pearson correlation and multiple regression) were used to answer research questions. Findings from this study showed that terminal GI cancer patients had a significantly worse QOL than non-terminal GI cancer patients (t=-2.18, p<0.05). Intensity of pain, physical performance status, spirituality, and social support as a set explained 39.4% of the variance on patients' QOL. GI cancer patients who suffered less pain, who had better physical health status as well as greater spirituality had a significantly better QOL. This study should be replicated in the future using larger sample in order to validate findings from this study. It will be also valuable to use methodological triangulation by combining both quantitative and qualitative methodologies to further characterize QOL in cancer patients.
The purpose of this study was to: (1) compare quality of life (QOL) between terminal and non-terminal gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients, (2) understand influencing factors of GI cancer patients' QOL. A cross-sectional design with convenience sampling was used in this study. Structured questionnaires, such as demographic scale, McGill QOL instrument, Pain intensity subscale, Spiritual wellbeing scale, and Social support instrument were chosen to measure study variables. Eighty-seven GI cancer patients (47 terminal and 40 non-terminal) were recruited from five teaching hospitals in the north, middle, and south part of Taiwan. Descriptive analysis and predictive analysis (independent t test, Pearson correlation and multiple regression) were used to answer research questions. Findings from this study showed that terminal GI cancer patients had a significantly worse QOL than non-terminal GI cancer patients (t=-2.18, p<0.05). Intensity of pain, physical performance status, spirituality, and social support as a set explained 39.4% of the variance on patients' QOL. GI cancer patients who suffered less pain, who had better physical health status as well as greater spirituality had a significantly better QOL. This study should be replicated in the future using larger sample in order to validate findings from this study. It will be also valuable to use methodological triangulation by combining both quantitative and qualitative methodologies to further characterize QOL in cancer patients.