透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.201.71
  • 期刊

簡介唾液壓力反應生物指標

Salivary Stress Biomarkers: An Introduction.

摘要


飛行是一項危險與挑戰性的工作,飛行員承受加速度、噪音、缺氧、極端溫度等潛在的危險,以及不規則工作時間、生理週期紊亂等壓力。過度或過久的壓力,會危害身體。過去從事人體壓力反應研究,常須採取侵犯性檢查方式例如抽血或記錄神經活性。本文介紹兩種唾液中的壓力反應生物指標α-澱粉酶與腎上腺皮質醇,討論目前對這兩種生物指標的了解及影響其變化的因子,提供未來於航空醫學方面的研究參考。

並列摘要


Flying is a challenging career as pilots are facing dangers such as hypoxia, acceleration, cold, disrupted circadian rhythm and decompression in an extremely risky environment. Studies that need to evaluate pilots stress usually use invasive methodologies such as blood withdrawal or single nerve recording. This article introduces two salivary stress biomarkers - α-amylase and cortisol. Current understanding and possible confounding factors about those two biomarkers are discussed to provide basic understanding about these biomarkers. Salivary α-amylase activity and cortisol concentration may become non-invasive and easy to use tool for future aviation medicine and physiology studies.

被引用紀錄


翁銘隆(2020)。都會中虛擬實境森林療癒建置效果之評估〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202001048
羅祥宜(2017)。虛擬實境之森林與都市環境對生心理影響之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201700517
林家民(2017)。森林療癒對中高齡與高齡者健康效益之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600268
李婷婷、林惠美(2021)。運動訓練中自主神經的變化以及對於瘦身蛋白與唾液澱粉酶的影響運動研究30(2),45-56。https://doi.org/10.6167/JSR.202112_30(2).0004

延伸閱讀


  • 婁培人、陳文彬、李憲彥、徐茂銘(1997)。唾液腺的神經支配中華民國耳鼻喉科醫學會雜誌32(3),297-303。https://doi.org/10.6286/1997.32.3.297
  • Li, Y. W. (1982). 唾液腺攝影. 中華放射線醫學雜誌, 7(1), 6-19. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10188940-198203-7-1-6-19-a
  • 謝幸媚、蘇正憲、蔡麗琴(2021)。唾液鑑別方法之評估台灣法醫學誌13(1),25-33。https://doi.org/10.6134/tjfm.202106_13(1).0009
  • Tsigou, E., Psallida, V., Demponeras, C., Boutzouka, E., & Baltopoulos, G. (2013). Role of New Biomarkers: Functional and Structural Damage. Critical Care Research and Practice, 2013(), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/361078
  • Kuei, C. H., Hsiao, P. J., & Liao, C. H. (2011). The Frontiers of Biomarkers in Voiding Dysfunction. Incontinence & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 5(2), 35-37. https://doi.org/10.6259/IPFD.2011.5.2.35