透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.218.110.116
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

王世貞《史乘考誤》對《明實錄》之辨證及其影響

On Wang Shizhen's Textual Criticism about Mingshilu by His Shicheng Kaowu and Its Influence

摘要


明朝撰修實錄制度上有不少缺陷,致使《明實錄》有許多先天性的不足,加上總裁之黨同伐異,編修官之肆意誣罔,《明實錄》有許多闕失,故成為明清史家重點考辨的對象。王世貞是明代第一位系統考辨《明實錄》的史家,《史乘考誤》針對《明太祖實錄》到《隆慶實錄》十部實錄的問題,進行了較系統的辨證,澄清了許多事實。同時開啓了後代對《明實錄》的考辨之風,錢謙益與潘檉章正是在王世貞考辨的基礎上,進一步深化對《明實錄》的考訂與研究的。

關鍵字

王世貞 史乘考誤 明實錄 錢謙益 潘檉章 明史

並列摘要


There are many defects in Mingshilu because Ming’s official compiling system has some basic problems and the Editor-in chiefs have sectional and controversial prejudices when they compiled Mingshilu. Therefore, many historians in Ming-Qing period paid much attention to do textual criticism on Mingshilu Wang Shizhen was the first historian who made thorough and serious textual studies about Mingshilu. He analyzed almost every compiled Mingshilu in his times from Ming Taizu Shilu to Ming Longqing Shilu in his book Shicheng Kaowu. The achievement of Wang Shizhen on the study of Mingshilu had been the foundation of Qian Qianyi and Pan Chengzhang's textual criticism on Mingshihi while Qian Qianyi and Pan Chengzhang made more penetrating critical studies on Mingshilu.

參考文獻


明王世貞(1976)。弇州山人四部稿。台北:偉文圖書出版有限公司。
明王世貞著、魏連科點校(1985)。弇山堂別集。北京:中華書局。
明王世貞(1987)。影印文淵閣四庫全書。上海:上海古籍出版社。
明王鏊(1985)。震澤長語。北京:中華書局。
包遵彭主編(1968)。明史考證抉微。台北:學生書局。

被引用紀錄


徐智敏(2012)。明隆慶能臣高拱之研究〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-1903201314432149
何幸真(2013)。明代的建文朝歷史記憶〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0801201418034158

延伸閱讀