透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.109.5
  • 期刊

從社會與風險資本觀點比較經濟風險下的企業生存之道

Survival Strategies of Business Organizations under Economic Risks: Perspective of Comparing Social and Risk Capital

摘要


面對新資本主義社會的經濟風險特性,企業組織必須發展一些策略來預先防範或加以因應解決。企業組織在經濟風險環境下所採取的策略包含風險資本和社會資本,由於經濟風險的形成有許多不是屬於經濟因素所造成,因此企業組織除了例行的運作管理外,也必須維持住一定的風險資本或社會資本以因應隨時可能發生的經濟風險,而非經濟風險對企業組織產生衝擊時再來思考解決之道。風險資本與社會資本雖然同樣都是企業組織用來因應經濟風險的方式,但兩者在本質、形成的方式、企業主的認知以及功能上卻有顯著的差異性。本文將以人力資本類推到風險資本所強調的企業組織特質能力,以及把個人的社會資本擴大為企業組織的社會資本,來比較管理學與社會學在因應經濟風險的策略上有何不同,並理出兩者的優點與差異。

並列摘要


Business organizations have to develop some strategies to prevent or cope with economic risks when they face a neo-capitalist society; these strategies should include risk and social capital. Beside routine administration, business organizations must always hold considerable risk and social capital to prepare for economic risks before they occur rather than treat them negatively after business organizations are impacted because economic risks are caused not only by economic factors. Although both risk and social capital are tools for alleviating economic risks, they are different in substance, formation, utility and the cognizance of CEO. This paper draws an analogy between a business organization’s human capital, which is a key factor in assessing an organization’s abilities, and its risk capital. It also draws an analogy between individual social capital and business organizations’ social capital. It then compares the differences and advantages of these managerial and sociological strategies in facing economic risks.

參考文獻


李惠斌、李惠斌、楊雪冬編(2000)。社會資本與社會發展。北京:社會科學文獻。
林芯玫(2002)。我國筆記型電腦代工廠商競爭優勢之探討。東吳大學企業管理學系。
林建山()。
高承恕(1989)。對「家族」在中國社會結構中的一點參考。社會與經濟。7
高宣揚(1998)。當代社會理論(下)。台北:五南。

延伸閱讀