人類可藉由視覺系統辨認出環境中景物的位置、形狀、色彩等等景觀元素,更進一步的喚起高層次的認知與情感。對於景觀設計實務而言,景觀設計專家依據理論所提供的設計範本,與一般民眾在使用上的真正需求是否一致,會直接的影響此作品的成功與否。因此,本研究個別訪談18名專家以及16名一般民眾,以ZMET圖像誘引的半結構訪談方式,萃取出受訪者更多更深層的概念。爲了能更進一步瞭解兩群組的概念異同,本研究結合KRGT的方格比較分析,對於景觀設計專家與一般民眾的相同性與差異性做一比較分析。結果顯示,在景觀設計專家與一般民眾的概念系統中,除了共同提及的部分外,專家較著重於設計的「過程」,而民眾較注意的是設計的「結果」。而在方格比較上,可明顯的看出景觀設計專家與一般民眾對彼此概念分布的差異性。此結果可與景觀設計實務結合,或許可以對於人們對於環境的感知有更進一步的瞭解。
Human can identify location, feature, shape, color and other landscape elements via visual system. In landscape design practice, however, do the theoretical-based landscape design which experts provided is the same as the needs by public can directly affects the success of a work. Therefore, this study has collected data from 18 experts and 16 public which ZMET semi-structured interview is used to extract a deeper concept. In order to find out the common and difference of landscape design concepts from these groups, a comparative analysis is studied by using ZMET and KRGT. Results showed that experts have focused on the ”process” of a design, while public have paid more attention to the ”results” of a design. Hence, the concept of distribution is clearly differentiated between these groups via using grid analysis. In conclusion, the result of the study not only can be used as a reference in landscape design, but provides an understanding of environment perception to the public.