合作學習班與普通班在籃下一分鐘投籃與學習態度差異之研究－以蘭陽技術學院為例

Are There Difference between Cooperative Learning and Traditional Learning on Basketball Skill and Learning Attitude-A Case Study in Lan Yang Institute of Technology

熊明禮(Ming-Lee Hsiung) ； 王鍵慰(Chien-Wei Wang) ； 陳春安(Chun-An Chen)

《輔仁大學體育學刊》 3期 (2004/05) Pp. 73-85

https://doi.org/10.29697/JPE.200405.0008

摘要

The purpose of the study was to examine the different between cooperative learning and traditional learning toward to basketball skill and learning attitude. Fifty-four male students, and forty-two female students were the subjects of this study. During four weeks basketball skill class, and the instrument of the learning attitude scale (Cronbach α=.656866) was administered to subjects. The total subjects were 100 students, and 96 copies were valid (96%). The SPSS 10.0 for Windows statistical methods was used to analyze the data. The significant level was set at p＜.05. The findings were as followed:
A) The different between cooperative learning and traditional learning on basketball skill.
The traditional learning used to be a personal learning center, and less teams-work concept. The cooperative learning used feedback teach style to be a teams-work concept, interaction, and help each other. So the cooperative learning performance was better than the traditional learning.
B) The different between cooperative learning and traditional learning on learning attitude.
1. On learning method of learning attitude aspect.
There can't supply good learning environment, and no new teach method of traditional learning. There can supply multi-teach method, interaction, and reinforce learning attitude. So the cooperative leaning attitude was better than the traditional leaning.
2. On learning plan of learning attitude aspect.
The traditional learning was no learning plans for prepare courses, and the course information gains from teacher. The cooperative learning can change learning attitude, build learning plans, and promotion learning effects. So the cooperative learning plan was better than the traditional learning.

關鍵字

合作學習班 ； 普通班 ； 學習態度 ； 學生小組成就區分法

並列摘要

The purpose of the study was to examine the different between cooperative learning and traditional learning toward to basketball skill and learning attitude. Fifty-four male students, and forty-two female students were the subjects of this study. During four weeks basketball skill class, and the instrument of the learning attitude scale (Cronbach α=.656866) was administered to subjects. The total subjects were 100 students, and 96 copies were valid (96%). The SPSS 10.0 for Windows statistical methods was used to analyze the data. The significant level was set at p＜.05. The findings were as followed:
A) The different between cooperative learning and traditional learning on basketball skill.
The traditional learning used to be a personal learning center, and less teams-work concept. The cooperative learning used feedback teach style to be a teams-work concept, interaction, and help each other. So the cooperative learning performance was better than the traditional learning.
B) The different between cooperative learning and traditional learning on learning attitude.
1. On learning method of learning attitude aspect.
There can't supply good learning environment, and no new teach method of traditional learning. There can supply multi-teach method, interaction, and reinforce learning attitude. So the cooperative leaning attitude was better than the traditional leaning.
2. On learning plan of learning attitude aspect.
The traditional learning was no learning plans for prepare courses, and the course information gains from teacher. The cooperative learning can change learning attitude, build learning plans, and promotion learning effects. So the cooperative learning plan was better than the traditional learning.

並列關鍵字

Cooperative Learning ； Traditional Learning ； Learning Attitude ； Students Teams-Achievement Divisions

參考文獻

毛連塭、陳麗華編譯(1987)。精熟學習法。台北:心理出版社。

王秀槐(1985)。國中高低成說學生家庭環境與學習態度之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所。

周立勳(1984)。國小班級分組合作學習之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所。

林繼盛()。,未出版。

溫世頌(1986)。教育心理學。台北市:三民書局。