透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.116.20
  • 期刊

從合法性、平等到人性尊嚴:論德沃金法哲學的道德基礎

From Legality, Equality to Human Dignity: On the Moral Foundation of Ronald Dworkin's Legal Philosophy

摘要


本文以德沃金晚近的法哲學理論為研究對象,嘗試對其理論的道德基礎,即從合法性、平等到人性尊嚴三個政治道德價值,進行分析考察與檢討反省。第二節介紹德沃金近來對法律的概念提出的類型區分,分析合法性價值作為法律之重要政治道德價值的理論意涵;第三節考察德沃金合法性價值觀的實質內涵,即整全性(integrity)與平等(equality)的政治道德價值;第四節進一步探討,德沃金以合法性、整全性及平等作為其法哲學理論的道德基礎,實際上是立基於一個更根本、但也饒富爭議的論述上,亦即他對於「人性尊嚴原則」的論述;第五節審視人性尊嚴原則在德沃金法哲學理論的關鍵地位,並檢討該論述所衍生出來的關於人是否有內在客觀價值的哲學爭議,同時提出一些初步的檢討與省思;最後,第六節除簡要總結本文論點外,也將概述德沃金對法律與道德之關係的最終看法。

並列摘要


This essay attempts to explore and reflect the moral foundation of Ronald Dworkin's legal philosophy, that is, the political moral values from legality, equality to human dignity. Part 2 will introduce Dworkin's recent argument about different concepts of law and analyze the theoretical implication that treats legality as an important political moral value of law. Part 3 examines the substantive content of legality, i.e., the political moralities of integrity and equality. Part 4 argues that, the moral foundation of Dworkin's legal philosophy not only lies in the values of legality, integrity, and equality, it is also grounded on a more fundamental but controversial argument, namely, the argument about the principles of human dignity. Accordingly, Part 5 will further investigate the philosophical debate derived from the argument of human dignity. It is the debate about whether each person has an intrinsic value of life. Finally, Part 6 will briefly summarize the points of this essay and generally sketch Dworkin's concluding claim about the relation of law and morality.

參考文獻


Dworkin, Ronald(1978).Taking Rights Seriously.London:Duckworth.
Dworkin, Ronald(1986).Law's Empire.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald(1993).Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom.London:Harper Collin.
Dworkin, Ronald(2006).Justice in Robes.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Pres.
Dworkin, Ronald(2006).Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for A New Political Debate.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.

被引用紀錄


莊世同(2016)。論平等與法治:評釋字728號解釋政治與社會哲學評論(57),1-46。https://doi.org/10.6523/168451532016060057001
陳閔翔(2014)。作為平等的正義:德沃金平等自由主義的理路與辯護政治與社會哲學評論(51),93-138。https://doi.org/10.6523/168451532014120051003

延伸閱讀