透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.44.108
  • 期刊

民主改革的政治:困難與策略

The Politics of Democratic Reform: Difficulties and Strategies

摘要


民主制度的改革往往極難被啟動,而且既有的民主制度安排,也往往極難經由制式的民主決策程序獲得改變。不過,在傳統的改革論述的影響下,民主改革者多半視改革的困難為理所當然,也不太考慮要以何種策略推動改革。民主法的新制度論已經揭示了「改革的政治」的重要性。基於民主法新制度論的問題意識與理論關懷,本文整合運用發展自比較憲政制度、憲法理論、民主法、國會法等相關學術領域的分析觀點,探討改革的政治帶給民主改革者的兩項政治習題:(i)為什麼民主改革在許多時候是困頓難行的?(ii)面對困境,改革者可以採取哪些做法,來推動、促成民主改革?除了嘗試藉由一般理論層次的分析與說明,盤點並開展關於「如何從事民主改革的政治」這件事情的應用知識,本文基於應用民主理論的自我定位,也試圖影響、改變民主改革社群面對改革的政治的規範態度。本文主張:(i)民主改革者應當學習做一個改革的現實主義者,認真看待現實政治之於民主改革的限制、挑戰及機遇。(ii)民主改革者還應當積極面對策略政治之於民主改革的機會與挑戰,本於政治智慧與責任倫理,從事改革策略的選擇及創新。

關鍵字

改革的政治 民主 民主改革 憲政 民主法

並列摘要


Political reform of democratic institutions often encounters significant hurdles and prevails only at the mercy of political fortuna. The prevailing rhetoric of democratic reform, however, says nothing about the politics of reform. Inspired by the recent institutional turn in law of democracy scholarship and using analytical and conceptual tools as developed by students of democratic institutions and political reforms in adjacent fields, this article attempts to develop a general applied theory about the politics of democratic reform. This article first identifies and analyzes six common difficulties facing democratic reformers. It also takes a closer look at crisis as a double-edged sword for democratic reform. It then assesses four typical strategies (approaches, or game plans) for democratic reform. While the main objective of this theoretical endeavor is to deepen the understanding about the difficulties and possibilities of democratic reform from the standpoint of the democratic reformers, this article also argues for realism and strategic thinking as necessary virtues to be cultivated in the reform community.

參考文獻


官曉薇,2016。〈美國法上對於公司言論自由保障之反思——論美國最高法院United v. F.E.C判決〉,《臺北大學法學論叢》,98期,頁1-83。
Achen, Christopher H. and Larry M. Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Barber, Benjamin R. 2003/1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for A New Age. California: University of California Press.
Bartolini, Stefano. 2000. “Collusion, Competition and Democracy,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12(1): 33-65.
Berlin, Isaiah. 1993/1978. The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy's View of History. Chicago, I.L.: Ivan R. Dee, Inc. Publisher.

被引用紀錄


傅鈺如(2017)。國家大規模興訟與政策爭議:以全國關廠工人案與華光社區案為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703881

延伸閱讀