透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.198.49
  • 期刊

以系統功能語言學探討學生對不同科學文本的閱讀理解

The Impact of a Systemic Functional Linguistics-Based Science Text and a Conventional Science Text on Students' Reading Comprehension

摘要


本文以系統功能語言學(SFL)觀點,探討學生對不同科學文本的閱讀理解。文本有二:依SFL之技術性建構及語體組織設計的SFL 文本(ST)及以國中科學文本為主的傳統文本(CT),分別供實驗組及對照組閱讀,並以先備知識測驗(PKT)及閱讀理解測驗(RCT)瞭解學生的先備知識及閱讀理解。研究分為二個實驗,實驗一分析二組學生的閱讀及作答RCT時間,實驗二則探討學生對文本的閱讀理解。結果顯示實驗組的閱讀及作答時間明顯多於對照組,意味著ST使學生花費較多時間仔細閱讀及作答。整體而言,實驗組閱讀理解的表現較佳。此外,實驗組之低先備知識者在句義、推理及應用的表現明顯較佳,顯示ST結構似乎可促進學生的閱讀理解,對低先備知識者尤具助益。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of different science texts on students' reading comprehension, as analyzed from the perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). Two texts were designed that the SFL text (ST) was designed by the theory of technicality construction and genre organization in SFL for the ST group, and the Conventional Text (CT) was the standard secondary school text for the CT group. Prior Knowledge Test (PKT) and the Reading Comprehension Test (RCT), the instruments, were designed to probe the students’ prior knowledge and reading comprehension. There were two experiments. The first analyzed the speed of reading and answering RCT for both groups, while the second compared the reading comprehension level in the two groups. According to the results, students in the ST group spent a significantly longer reading and answering time on the RCT, which implied that much more effort was needed by them to read and answer this test carefully. Additionally, the reading comprehension in the ST group was better than that in the CT group. Furthermore, the performance of the low prior knowledge students in the ST group was significantly better than that in the CT group in terms of the literacy, inference, and application. These results implied that the ST could facilitate the students' reading comprehension, especially for those low prior knowledge students.

被引用紀錄


謝卓君、閔詩紜(2022)。臺灣閱讀教育治理之城鄉差異探究教育科學研究期刊67(4),73-104。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0003
吳昭容、鄭鈐華、張凌嘉(2021)。從算式或文字閱讀數學科普文章:共變數分析與階層線性模式的比較教育科學研究期刊66(1),107-139。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0004
張家翎、邱銘心(2020)。How Much Do Pregnant Women Know? An Exploratory Study on the Readability of Frequently-used Nutrition Terms圖書資訊學刊18(2),139-165。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.202012_18(2).139
許慶堂(2006)。科學課文中零代詞對學生閱讀理解的影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716124784
王建中(2006)。不同試題論述方式對學生作答表現影響之分析-以TIMSS 2003試題為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716101219

延伸閱讀