並列摘要
For years we presuppose that a written constitution and an institution of judicial review are not only the foundations of democracy but also a prerequisite for the protection of civil rights. Up to now, few nations, including authoritarian and even totalitarian nations, exist without a written constitution and an institution of judicial review. However, according to the empirical data, based on 156 nations, the relationship between judicial review and protection of civil rights is hardly tenable. The key factor in the safeguarding of civil rights is not the institution of judicial review, but the degree of democratization, embodied in an elective legislature to limit government powers. The main purpose of judicial review is to resolve the conflict between the federal and state government in order to maintain the federalism.
延伸閱讀
- 邱清華（2019）。建構一個符合民意的司法科學鑑定制度。台灣法醫學誌，11(1&2)，1-2。https://doi.org/10.6134/tjfm.201912_11(1_2).0001
- 邱清華（2016）。建構一個符合民意的司法科學鑑定制度。台灣法醫學誌，8(2)，1-3。https://doi.org/10.6134/tjfm.2016.0802.01
- 黃茂榮（1982）。法律體系之存在基礎及其定義。臺大法學論叢，12(1)，163-203。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.1982.12.01.07
- 陳麗芬（2012）。Research on Legal System of Judicial Ethics Regulations〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.02522
- 姚文成（2004）。Review and Opinion: Judicial Review and Political Questions in R.O.C。華岡社科學報，(18)，87-122。https://doi.org/10.6363/HKJSS.200406.0087