反介入／區域拒止（A2/AD）威脅與美軍空海整理戰（AirSea Battle）發展概念

A2/AD Threats and U.S. AirSea Battle Concept Development

李建昇(Chien-Sheng Li)

《國防雜誌》 27卷5期 (2012/09) Pp. 50-65

https://doi.org/10.6326/NDJ.2012.27(5).3

摘要

美國防部淨評估辦公室於前蘇聯解體後分析美國未來可能會遭遇的威脅與挑戰，參考地緣及海權戰略觀念及名詞，提出反介入／區域拒止用詞供各部門參考運用。此後，反介入／區域拒止乙詞就成廣為運用的軍事用語。空海整體作戰是美軍繼空地整體作戰、空天整體作戰及網狀化作戰理論之後所發展出的新作戰理論。美軍發展空海整體作戰理論，主要是美軍在檢視美國未來面臨全球整體安全環境中，針對具有反介入／區域拒止軍事能力的國家，所發展制勝之道的初步作戰概念。與美國一樣，臺灣無論是在地緣上或是國家安全威脅的來源上，都是面對中共殺手鐧軍事能力的威脅與挑戰，因此，國軍也應受空海整體作戰的啟發，研究國軍必須具備的軍事能力與致勝之道。

關鍵字

空地整體戰 ； 空海整體作戰 ； 反介入 ； 區域拒止

並列摘要

After Soviet Union collapsed, the Net Assessment Office of US DoD analyzed the potential challenges and threats that US could face and consulted the terms and meanings of geography and strategy of sea power. Then the A2 and AD published by the Net Assessment Office became a widespread military acronym. The theory of AirSea Battle is a new military concept following the ideas of Air Land Battle, Air Space Combat and Network Centric Warfare.AirSea Battle is developed to deter or defeat the threats of A2/AD capabilities when US DoD overviewed the future global security environment. Like the U.S., Taiwan (R.O.C.) has actual faced PLA's constant threats over six decades. By facing PLA's continuing threats of A2/AD capabilities, hence, ROC has to concern the situation we meet today. ROC can be inspired by US developing concept of AirSea Battle to develop our own operational concept to deter PLA's aggression.

並列關鍵字

Air Land Battle ； AirSea battle ； anti-access ； area denial