On the Dualistic Assumptions Underlying G. H. von Wright's Non-Causal Explanatory Model

I first offer a brief characterization of the argument supporting von Wright's non-causal explanatory model for the human sciences (section I). The discussion then moves on to compare von Wright's argument to Donald Davidson's causal theory of action (section II). My contention here is that von Wright is committed to denying token physicalism, thus embracing some form of event-dualism. This has traditionally been understood to entail the ＂congruence problem＂ for von Wright's model-the problem, that is, of accounting for the very occurrence of bodily movements given an agent's intentions. In the last section of the paper (section III), 1 sketch a possible solution to the congruence problem.

並列關鍵字

無資料

被引用紀錄

黃翔瑞（2006）。螺旋星系動力學〔碩士論文，國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2006.00313

王珮琪（2008）。Clara Schumann為鋼琴創作的個性小品研究〔碩士論文，國立臺北藝術大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6835/TNUA.2008.00061

賈光亞（2012）。全民健保藥價政策問題研究：以政策利害關係人政策網絡觀點〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.10003

王威智（2010）。台灣小劇場論述研究──翻譯現代與想像國族〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.03223

陳敏華（2007）。應用模擬退火法及景觀指數於集水區土地利用最佳化規劃〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.02665

國際替代計量

On the Dualistic Assumptions Underlying G. H. von Wright's Non-Causal Explanatory Model

全文下載

主題瀏覽