透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.208.72
  • 期刊

身心障礙者定額進用條款之合憲性探討-以身心障礙者權益保障法爲中心

The Constitutionality of Employment Quota in Disability Law-Focus on People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act

摘要


本文探討台灣對於身心障礙者勞動保護特殊扶助措施-定額進用條款之發展與相關法律問題。首先將先介紹台灣法律規範中身心障礙者勞動定額進用定額之發展,此部份隨著政治與社會變遷以及身心障礙者的權利提昇,從1980年開始至今有相當大的改變。身心障礙者進用定額從任意到強制,適用之公私企業也逐擴大。其次,討論現行身心障礙者定額進用條款的問題與現狀。身心障礙者進用條款之實踐好壞參半,一方面存在超額進用身心障礙者的情況,另一方面也存在無法達成定額進用的情況,本文將對此提出說明與分析。由於定額進用是優惠性差別待遇(affirmative action),與憲法平等權息息相關。本文也將對定額進用條款是否符合台灣憲法中的基本權保障提出分析。最後提出本文結論。

並列摘要


This article is going to discuss the protection that Taiwan government provides for the individuals with disabilities in terms of their rights to work, the development of the employment quota and its allocation, as well as the related legal issues. Firstly in this article the author will introduce the development of the law in Taiwan, which regulates the employment quota allocated among individuals with disabilities. This part of law has a major difference due to the evolution of the structure of the society and the development of the political atmosphere since year 1980. The employment quota for the people with disabilities in an enterprise was applied from at will to mandatory, and the applicability of this mechanism is gradually expanded among private and government entities. The author will then talk about the status of the current applicable law regarding the allocation of employment quota and the problems it is facing when implementing the law. In this part the author will also analyze the up and down sides of the implementation of the employment quota clause where both situations of exceed and failure to achieve the employment quota exist. Subsequently, the author will in this article analyze the constitutionality of the employment quota clause regarding whether the enactment of which was in accordance with the principle of ”right of equal protection,” since the employment quota is to realize the ”affirmative action” provided in the Constitution, which is closely relevant to the ”right of equal protection.” At the end of this article the author will provide conclusion for the above discussions and analysis.

參考文獻


李惠宗(1997)。憲法要義。臺北:元照出版有限公司。
周月清(1998)。身心障礙者福利與家庭社會工作─理論、實務與研究。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
法治斌、董保城(2005)。憲法新論。臺北:元照出版有限公司。
陳新民(2001)。中華民國憲法釋論。臺北:三民書局。
法治斌編(2003)。法治國家與表意自由。臺北:正典出版公司。

被引用紀錄


許萃華(2017)。身心障礙者公職參與權之憲法保障及其界限─以考試制度及程序為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201704177
蔡晴羽(2017)。從憲法平等權論私部門對前科者之就業歧視〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201701132
黃綉雅(2017)。公部門低性別比例員工優先進用升遷之研究—比較法之觀察〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201701081
林明昕(2016)。基本國策之規範效力及其對社會正義之影響臺大法學論叢45(S),1305-1358。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2016.45.SP.04

延伸閱讀