透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.197.123
  • 期刊

股市政策與中國證券業近期之生產力動態績效研究

STOCK MARKET POLICY AND DYNAMIC PRODUCTIVITY PERFORMANCE OF CHINESE SECURITIES INDUSTRY IN RECENT YEARS

摘要


滬港通政策導致2015年中國股市巨幅交易量,推升了股市之規模。不過,此政策對中國證券業生產力績效之影響仍缺乏深入的研究。本文旨在衡量中國證券商近期之動態效率、技術進步及生產力等績效,並探討政策實施對不同特性證券商之績效影響。我們應用2009至2017年共80家證券商進行實證。研究結果發現:證券商之績效深受股市政策影響,「滬港通」政策之實施非但提升了中國股市規模,亦有效提高了證券商的經營績效。而中國證券業的生產力變動主要係源自純技術效率之變動,兩者在研究期間變動趨勢一致,並與股市交易規模變動方向相近。不過,證券商的經營技術卻呈全期持續提升,不受股市波動影響;其中,規模大、上市、及京滬深地區的證券商在其技術進步幅度上亦較大。研究亦發現「滬港通」政策對不同類別證券商績效亦有顯著的影響。

並列摘要


The policy of Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect has resulted in a huge boost in stock trading volume in 2015 and escalated the scale of stock market in China. However, few studies have investigated thoroughly the impact of this policy on the productivity performance of the Chinese securities industry. This paper attempts to evaluate the dynamic performance of Chinese securities firms in recent years. We also assess the impact of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect policy on productivity performance of different types of securities firms. A panel data set with 80 securities firms in 2009-2017 is used for empirical measurement. We find that the performance of Chinese securities firms has been strongly influenced by the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect policy. During the study period, policy has not only boosted the scale of stock market, but also resulted in better performance of securities firms. While the productivity change of Chinese securities industry can be mostly attributed to technical efficiency change, the operational technology of China securities industry has increased over time. Results also indicate that large, listed, or locating in Beijing-Shanghai-Shejen region securities firms are found to perform better in terms of technical progress than other securities firms in China. Lastly, policy impacts on productivity performance for different types of securities firms are significantly different.

參考文獻


王兵, 熊美紅與朱寧(2011), 「中國證券公司全要素生產率研究—基於 MML 生產率指數的實證分析」, 《廣東金融學院學報》, 26(6), 93–107。(Wang, B., M.-H. Xiong, and N. Zhu (2011), “The Study of Total Factor Productivity of Securities Firms in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on MML Productivity Index,” Journal of Guangdong University of Finance, 26(6), 93–107.)
王國樑, 翁志強與張美玲(1998), 「臺灣綜合證券商技術效率探討」, 《證券市場發展季刊》, 10(2), 93–116。(Wang, K.-L., C.-C. Weng, and M.-L. Chang (1998), “A Study of Technical Efficiencies of Integrated Securities Firms in Taiwan,” Review of Securities and Futures Markets, 10(2), 93–116.)
王媛慧, 李文福與翁竹君(2007), 「臺灣國際觀光旅館業生產力與效率分析: 隨機邊界距離函數之應用」, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 35(1), 55–86。(Wang, Y.-H., W.-F. Lee, and C.-C. Wong (2007), “Productivity and Efficiency Analysis of International Tourist Hotels in Taiwan: An Application of the Stochastic Frontier Approach,” Taiwan Economic Review, 35(1), 55–86.)
王曉芳與程可勝(2009), 「中國證券業效率的動態分析」, 《產業經濟研究》, 2, 49–54。(Wang, X.-F. and K.-S. Cheng (2009), “An Analysis on Dynamic Efficiency of China Securities Industry,” Industrial Economics Research, 2, 49–54.)
王聰與宋慧英(2012), 「中國證券公司股權結構、市場結構與成本效率的實證研究」, 《金融研究》, 5, 80–92。(Wang, C. and H.-Y. Song (2012), “An Empirical Research on the Relationship among the Ownership Structure, Market Structure and Cost Efficiency of Securities Companies in China,” Journal of Financial Research, 5, 80–92.)

延伸閱讀