- 期刊
The Republic of china treated in General History Textbooks: A Case Study of Historically Correct History Versus Politically Correct History
歐美通史教科書對中華民國之處理：兼論「為歷史而歷史」與「為政治而歷史」
並列摘要
Chinese history after 1911 is both eventful and complex. Given the sheer size of available information on the subject, the content of a general history of modern China is usually selective. To decide what information should be included in a general history and what can be left out of it is never easy for any historian. Yet the truth of history should be and can be preserved regardless of what information one chooses to use and how it is used. Take for instance the coverage on the Republic of China, while some general history textbooks acknowledge the historical significance of the Republic of China, many others have neglected its existence by excluding such information. Using as an example how the republic of China has been treated in some general history textbooks, this article looks at the impact on historical truth when certain essential historical facts are ignored.
延伸閱讀
- 李麗卿（1990）。國中國文教科書之政治社會化內容分析。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，()，449-466。https://doi.org/10.6910/BGIENTNU.199006_(32).0023
- 吳啟訥（2018）。人群分類與國族整合－中華人民共和國民族識別政策的歷史線索和政治面向（六）。遠望雜誌，(362)，46-54。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20130927002-201811-201811210006-201811210006-46-54
- 吳啟訥（2018）。人群分類與國族整合－中華人民共和國民族識別政策的歷史線索和政治面向（三）。遠望雜誌，(358)，60-64。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20130927002-201807-201807120017-201807120017-60-64
- 唐欣偉（2013）。美國國關學界對中國之評估：以攻勢現實主義與權力轉移論為例。政治科學論叢，(58)，47-70。https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.58(47-70)
- 吳正中（2017）。淺析中國大陸地區與西方政體關於「地方自治」之異同。社科法政論叢，(5)，83-108。https://doi.org/10.6268/RSSLP.2017.5.4