漢人經解與漢代思想研究的另一側面—試以陳澧《漢儒通義》對鄭玄《毛詩箋》的輯錄為例

The other Aspect of Researching the Han Scholars' Commentaries of Classics and the Han Thought-on the Collections of Zheng Xuan's Subcommentary of Maoshi by Chen Li's Han-Ru Tong-Yi

車行健(Hsing-Chien Che)

《先秦兩漢學術》 2期 (2004/09) Pp. 93-107

https://doi.org/10.29443/TLXQHD.200409.0005

摘要

漢代是經學昌明的時代，其時留存了大量的解經著作，當中亦有不少蘊含了豐富的義理思想，實是研究漢代學術思想所不可忽視的重要資源。然而長期以來漢人經解中的思想層面及其價值卻一直受到輕忽，甚至更有認為漢儒不講義理者。時至今日，思想史家在面對漢代學術思想時，亦甚少提及漢代經學中所蘊含的經學思想。本文有鑑於此，乃試圖透過清代陳澧所輯的《漢儒通義》一書所提供的材料，以其中所輯錄的鄭玄《毛詩箋》中之義理語為例來證明漢人經解中之思想成份，即使是公認文學傾向較強的《詩經》，漢人為之作註解時，亦有可能於其中貫注或賦予相當程度的義理思考內涵，更遑論其他解經之作。本文一方面展示了《漢儒通義》中所輯《毛詩箋》之思想面向及內涵，另外一方面也對陳澧輯錄的方式與標準做了一番方法論的檢討與反省，期待能以此做為進一步全面的研究漢代經學思想，或透過經解之作來探究漢代思想，提供一較穩固且可行的堅實基礎。

關鍵字

漢代思想 ； 鄭玄 ； 《毛詩箋》 ； 陳澧 ； 《漢儒通義》

並列摘要

It's an important era for Classics studies in Han dynasty. There were many writings on interpretations of Classics, in which contains abundant thoughts of philosophy. We should not ignore these important assets in studying intellectual thoughts in Han dynasty. For a long time, scholars often neglected the aspect of the thoughts and their values of Han Scholars' commentaries on Classics. So the paper will analyze the philosophical fragment abstracting from Zheng Xuan's Subcommentary of Maosi, which was collected by Chen Li in his Han-ru tong-yi, and well try to prove that Han scholars’ commentaries of Classics also feature the philosophical essence. If there were abundant philosophical contents in Shijin, which widely recognized as literature work, let alone other Classics.In the one side, this paper demonstrates the aspect of thoughts by Chen Li's collection of Zheng Xuan's Subcommentary of Maosi. In the other side, the paper also examines the methodology of Chen Li’s collection. We hope this task could construct a solid and rigid basis for subsequent studying about the thoughts of Han dynasty.

並列關鍵字

Han dynasty's thoughts ； Zheng Xuan ； Subcommentary of Maoshi ； Chen Li ； Han-ru tong-yi