透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.28.50
  • 期刊

翻轉課堂教學對學習成效影響之後設分析

A Meta-Analysis Study of the Impact for the Flipped Classroom Teaching on Learning Outcomes

摘要


近年來翻轉課堂教學模式發展迅速受到教育界的高度重視,此模式將傳統由教師於課堂上單向傳授知識的教學方式,轉換由學生於課前主動自學,在課堂上則透過老師引導與提問,進行師生或同儕間的討論與問題解決,成效頗受肯定。本研究旨在運用後設分析法(meta-analysis),對相關實徵研究資料進行客觀及計量性的分析,以瞭解翻轉課堂教學對於學生學習成效的影響。研究者從Web of Science和EBSCOhost-Academic Search Premier等資料庫進行搜尋,挑選符合研究主題並具有充足的實徵數據之文獻為分析樣象,共計13篇;採用Comprehensive Meta-Analysis軟體分析各篇文章之Hedges' g效應值,並進行出版偏誤、異質性考驗、累積分析、敏感度分析及次群體分析等,以考驗各項研究之間是否存在異質性及出版性偏誤等問題。根據研究結果指出,翻轉課堂教學對於學生的學習成效具有正向的效應,整體效應值為0.822,意即翻轉課堂教學模式對於情意及學業成就的提升,多數優於傳統講述式教學法。

並列摘要


The flipped-classroom has been promoted in recent years and quickly became a popular teaching model in the world. The model reverses traditional teaching where students gain exposure of material outside of class by reading textbook or watching videos before class; then class time is used to doing problem-solving, discussion, or debates leading by teachers. The purpose of this study was to understand the impacts of this teaching method based on the existing empirical studies. A meta-analysis approach was performed to synthesize quantitative research that investigated the effects of flipped classroom teaching on learning outcomes. The target studies were selected primarily from Web of Science and EBSCOhost-Academic Search Premier and resulted in 13 paper fitted in the criteria. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was used to analyze the effects of publication bias, heterogeneity tests, cumulative analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis within the study. The results demonstrated that flipped classroom model provided considerable benefits than traditional instruction did on students' learning outcomes (effect size = 0.822). To the end, the notable suggestions and limitations of this study were discussed.

參考文獻


田美雲(2013)。「翻轉教室」(Flipped Classroom)介紹。國立臺灣大學教學發展中心電子報,71。取自http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/_epaper/news_detail.php?nid=452
李茂能(2014)。整合軟體CAM 簡介與操作實務。台北:五南。
莊其穆(2011)。臨床醫師如何閱讀統合分析(Meta-analysis)的論文。臺灣醫界。54(2),18-26。
張明玲譯、Cooper, Harris(2013)。研究統合與後設分析。臺北市:揚智文化。
黃政傑(2014)。翻轉教室的理念、問題與。臺灣教育評論月刊。3(12),161-186。

被引用紀錄


江秀鳳(2018)。以數位原生學生行為特徵及學習特質為考量設計智慧型行動裝置及合作學習融入九年級音樂課程之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2018.00973
簡利穎(2015)。國小教師教學信念與電子教科書應用之個案研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00866
Lin, C. L. (2021). Examining Teachers' Acceptance of Flipped Learning by Using Technology Acceptance Model. 數位學習科技期刊, 13(4), 27-61. https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2021101304002
李秋璇(2010)。應用網路教學於護理系學生暴力處置課程知識成效之探討〔碩士論文,中山醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0003-1909201015102900
孫慕蘭(2012)。建物管理人員休閒參與、身心健康與工作績效相關研究─以台中地區物業管理公司為例〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-1511201214173297

延伸閱讀