黑格爾論分析認知與綜合認知

Hegel on Analytic Cognition and Synthetic Cognition

劉愛民(Ai-Min Liu)

《華梵人文學報》 22期 (2014/07) Pp. 1-42

摘要

本文的目的是依據黑格爾的《大邏輯》的第二部「主體邏輯」部的第三分「理念」分的第二章「認知的理念」章以及《小邏輯》第223節到236節論「認知」的章節作文本詮釋，從認知角度來證成黑格爾辯證法的科學性格，冀望藉此釐清黑格爾哲學中「導致如此多爭議的」、「最不為人所理解的面向之一」的辯證法的意義，並且助成黑格爾所說「只有通過辯證法，哲學才能夠是客觀的、業經證明的科學」。

關鍵字

分析認知 ； 綜合認知 ； 辯證法 ； 總念

並列摘要

The purpose of this paper is to corroborate the scientific character of Hegel's dialectics from the cognitive perspective, via textual interpretation of both his ＂Science of Logic＂ and ＂Encyclopaedia Logic＂, to clarify the meaning of dialectics which was purported to ＂have exerted as much influence or occasioned as much controversy as this method.＂ My conclusion attunes with Michael Forster who assigns a certain primacy to the dialectic of ＂Science of Logic＂ over that of ＂Phenomenology of Spirit＂, in that as the form of the pure thought, the dialectic of ＂Science of Logic＂ rests solely on the nature of the pure essentiality which constitutes the content of Logic.

並列關鍵字

analytic cognition ； synthetic cognition ； dialectics ； Begriff

參考文獻

Edwards, Paul(Ed.)(1967).The Encyclopedia of Philosophy.New York:Crowell Collier and MacMillan, Inc..

Beiser, Frederick C.(Ed.)(1993).The Cambridge Companion to Hegel.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

黑格爾賀麟譯(1998)。小邏輯。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。

黑格爾楊一之譯(1987)。大邏輯。臺北:谷風出版社。

楊維哲(1993)。微積分。臺北:三民書局。