- 期刊
初探安非他命使用者接受戒癮治療之評估工具
Pilot Study on Assessment Tools for Amphetamine Users Entering Addiction Treatment
摘要
目的：當安非他命使用者到醫院尋求戒癮治療，都需要接案評估，以利分流處遇，若能善用標準化評估工具協助配對適宜的處遇方案，將有助於提升醫療效能。本研究目的是探索安非他命使用者接受戒癮治療的評估工具，分析再測信度、哪些工具能預測復發用藥、以及哪些工具能做為療效評估之用。方法：本研究以106名門診的安非他命戒癮者為樣本，分析藥物濫用篩檢量表、藥物依賴嚴重度量表、中文版自我效能量表、貝克憂鬱量表第二版、貝克焦慮量表、巴氏衝動量表、魏氏成人智力量表的記憶廣度分測驗，以及愛荷華賭局測驗的再測信度；以二元邏輯斯迴歸分析，找出可預測藥癮復發用藥的工具；以相依樣本t檢定分析治療前後得分差異。結果：愛荷華賭局測驗的再測信度不顯著；藥物依賴嚴重度量表、貝克焦慮量表、巴氏衝動量表與記憶廣度分測驗的最長逆背可以預測有無藥癮復發用藥；藥物依賴嚴重度量表、貝克憂鬱量表第二版、貝克焦慮量表可做為成效評估工具。結論：如果評估時間短暫，可選用藥物依賴嚴重度量表、貝克焦慮量表、巴氏衝動量表與記憶廣度分測驗。而藥物依賴嚴重度量表、貝克憂鬱量表第二版、貝克焦慮量表可做為戒癮成效評估工具。未來可用戒治所或監獄等樣本重複此研究。進一步驗證巴氏衝動量表與記憶廣度分測驗是否可做為戒癮成效評估工具。
並列摘要
Objective: When an amphetamine user seeks addiction treatment at a hospital, we will conduct an intake assessment to facilitate subsequent diversion program. If the standardized assessment tools are fully utilized to help match drug users with appropriate treatment, it can streamline medical practice efficiency. The purpose of this study is to explore the assessment tools of amphetamine users receiving addiction treatment, to test the test-retest reliability of these assessment tools, to test which tools predicted the relapse to drug use, and to test which tools are suitable for evaluating the outcomes of addiction treatment. Methods: In this study, we researched a sample of 106 outpatient amphetamine users by analyzing the test-retest reliability of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10), Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS), Chinese version of General Self-Efficacy Scale (C-GSE), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Barratt impulsiveness scale (BIS-11), and Digit Span Subscale of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV), and Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Binary logistic regression was used to highlight tools that effect the relapse to drug use. In addition, we analyzed score changes between pretreatment and posttreatment with paired-samples t test. Results: The test-retest reliability of the IGT is not ideal. The SDS, BAI, BIS-11, and Digit Span Subscale can effectively predict the relapse to drug use. The SDS, BDI-II, and BAI can be the indicators of addiction treatment outcomes. Conclusions: For quick assessment, we can opt for SDS, BAI, BIS-11, and Digit Span subscale. The SDS, BDI-II, and BAI can be the indicators of addiction treatment outcomes. Repeat this study with samples from drug rehabilitation centers or prison for future use cases. Further confirm that BIS-11 and Digit Span Subscale are suitable for evaluating the outcomes of addiction treatment.