台灣綠建築九大評估指標改進方向之研究－以學校類建築之規劃設計為例

The Research of Enhancement on Taiwan's EEWH Evaluation System-To Use as an Example for Campus Building Design

張國禎(Kuo-Jen Zhang)

《中華建築技術學刊》 4卷1期 (2007/06) Pp. 47-54

https://doi.org/10.30021/JBCT.200706.0004

摘要

臺灣綠建築九大指標，僅「日常節能指標」係針對學校類型提出量化基準。對學校校園異於一般性建築環境的差異性，則未具體展現其獨特性，致校園有利於生態綠建築的規劃條件無法充分發揮。本研究之重要結果有二：（A）評估層面及權重：針對學校類建築之規劃設計，其指標內容應分為五大層面，即：區域環境衝擊之平衡、區域環境之水平衡、區域環境之綠平衡、區域環境之舒適性與節能、區域環境之廢棄物及垃圾的平街。及十九項評估準則。（B）各評估準則之間的關連性：經專家德懷術法求出各層面與評估準則間的平均權重值及其關係。最後以此權重建構出校園之評估體系與評估表，除供設計者生態設計權衡之參考，亦可作為性能式法規制定之參考。

關鍵字

校園生態化 ； 校園評估指標 ； 分析層級程式Analytic Hierarchy Process ； AHP ； 德懷術層級分析法

並列摘要

Among EEWH system(ecology, energy saving, waste reduction, healthy), only the 'energy saving' provides quality assessment type that concerned. As a result, few of them are able to gauge the differences between schools and ordinary building types so that the assessments are failed to demonstrate the unique of school building type, identity and advantages of environmental by planning.
The important results of this research were shown as follows: (A) Assessment levels and weight priorities: There are five levels of assessment when it comes to 'the assessment of school planning & design' and they are: Impacts balance of regional environment; Water balance of regional environment; Green balance of regional environment; Comfortablity & energy saving of regional environment; Waste & garbage management balance of regional environment. And the 19 principles. (B) Correlations between assessment levels and principles: After comparison and contraction in pairs, experts are able to establish the balanced priorities and find the correlations between the assessment levels and principles. The final results will on one hand serve as a planning reference for architects and land developers alike; on the other hand, it'll be a guideline for drafting performance code.

並列關鍵字

campus ecolization ； assessments for campus ； AHP ； Analytic Hierarchy Process ； Delphi Technique