透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.11.131
  • 期刊

從凱爾生理論談歐洲共同體法規範秩序

The Hierarchy of Norms in the European Community: A Kelsenian Perspective

摘要


本文從凱爾生的純粹法學出發,依次論述其法律體系觀、國際法規範位階秩序觀,以求釐清歐體法規範體系的秩序建立可能。藉由對於歐體寶際發展的建構方式、法規範位階秩序,以及歐體法院判例跟德國聯邦憲法法院判例之分析,本文嘗試從凱爾生之角度,釐清歐體與各成員國間不同法規範體系間的相互關係。本文認爲,以凱爾生國際法國內法一元論之理論,可以架構出歐體法國內法一元論或歐體法國內法多元論之主張,兩者在邏輯上皆可證成,惟迄令歐體之發展,應較偏向多元論之方式。

並列摘要


Analyzing the concept of legal system and the hierarchy of international legal order in Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law, this article tries to illuminate the possibility to construct a hierarchy of norms in European Community. By illustrating the actual constructing method of European Community and its legal order! hierarchy, and by analyzing the jurisprudences of European Court of Justice and of German Federal Constitutional Court, this article urges to clarify the relationship between the legal order of European Community and the ones of its Members states. In conclusion, this article identifies that according to the Kelsen’s Monism that explains the relationship between the national legal orders and international one, we could construct the European legal order, either in a Monist way or a Pluralist one. Both are justifiable logically. But, based on the actual development of European Community, this article concludes that a Pluralist way demonstrates a more accurate thesis.

被引用紀錄


林人一(2016)。德國聯邦憲法法院與歐洲跨國法院審判權關係之研究-自德國基本法之觀點-〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614052348

延伸閱讀