工程爭議在仲裁庭審理與法院專業法庭審理之不同

The Different Trial of ConstructionDisputes in the Arbitration and the Courts

蘇南(Nan Su) ； 呂坤宗(Kun-Zung Lu)

《財產法暨經濟法》 27期 (2011/09) Pp. 1-46

https://doi.org/10.29825/PELJ.201109.0001

摘要

於2009年營造業法修法，要求法院應成立工程專業法庭審理；故本文旨在將工程爭議案件的糾紛解決手段，如仲裁審理與專業法庭審理等之實體利益與程序經濟作比較。本文首先就工程爭議案件仲裁審理制度，包括仲裁協議、仲裁庭組織、仲裁程序之進行、仲裁判斷及其確定力、執行力進行探討。其次就法院工程專業法庭審理之組織制度、程序進行、證據、專業法庭判決之確定力進行剖析；並對我國工程專業法庭設立可能發生之問題進行探究。最後比較工程契約爭議在仲裁審理與專業法庭審理的優缺點，俾提供我國成立工程專業法庭之參考；也使當事人瞭解發生工程爭議時，究竟選擇仲裁審理或工程專業法庭審理對其何者有利。

關鍵字

專業法庭 ； 仲裁 ； 工程爭議 ； 訴訟 ； 仲裁判斷

並列摘要

The Construction Law was amended in 2009, asking the court should establish professional engineering division. The objective of this paper is to compare the differences of entity interests and economic litigation procedures in construction disputes to resolve the trial incompatibility by arbitration and professional engineering division.This article first investigates the arbitration legal system in its solution of construction disputes, including arbitration agreement, the tribunal organization, arbitration procedures, arbitration judgments, and the effect and enforcement of the arbitration judgments. Second, it is to investigate the organization of the professional engineering division at the court, litigation procedures, evidence, and the effect of the professional court. There is, however, some controversy in the existence of the professional engineering division. Finally, this paper makes a comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of contract dispute by arbitration with those by court to serve the litigation parties and to provide a reference for the court; also the comparison allows clients to understand project dispute occurred, whether the choice of arbitration or professional engineering division is more beneficial for the contested case.

並列關鍵字

Professional Tribunal ； Arbitration ； Engineering Disputes ； Litigation ； Arbitration Judgment