透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.129.43
  • 期刊

橄欖球賽不同位置球員及四種不同得分方式之比較分析

The Comparative Analysis of the Rugby Match that the Players on the Different Positions and Four Ways of Getting Points

摘要


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of the rugby match that the players on the different positions and four ways of getting points. Method: The data was investigating the scores from the preliminary contest to finals that the top four of the Rugby World Cup in 2003. The top four of teams were England, Australia, New Zealand and French. In accordance with the differences of the rugby match that the players on the different positions and four ways of getting points to make statistics, then compared with the statistical method that tests. Results: 1. The times of tries scored: (l).The position player of CE are higher than the player of such positions as PR, HK, SR, N8, SH etc. *9<05. (2). The position player of WI are higher than the player of such positions as PR, HK, SR, N8, SH, FB etc. *9<05. (3). The position player of PB are higher than the player of such positions as PR, HK, SR, FL, N8, SR etc. *9<05 .2. The times of Conversions scored: (l).The position player of FH was higher than the player of such positions as PR、HK、SR、FL、N8、SR、WI、FB etc. *9<05. (2).The position player of CE was higher than the player of such positions as PR、HK、SR、FL、N8、SH、WI、PB etc. *9<05. (3).The position player of FB was higher then the player of such positions as PR、HK、SR、FL、N8、SH、WI etc. *9<05.3. The times of Penalties scored: The position player of FH and CE were higher than the other position players. *p<05. 4. The times of Drop goals scored: The position player of FR and CE was higher than the other position players. *P<.05. Conclusion: 1 .The highest position players of getting points of tries were WI, CE, FB etc. 2. The most player could be pushed to conversions by the team were FR, CE, FB. 3. The most player could be pushed to penalties by the team were PH, CE. 4. The player that could use the best way to Drop goals was FH.

並列摘要


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of the rugby match that the players on the different positions and four ways of getting points. Method: The data was investigating the scores from the preliminary contest to finals that the top four of the Rugby World Cup in 2003. The top four of teams were England, Australia, New Zealand and French. In accordance with the differences of the rugby match that the players on the different positions and four ways of getting points to make statistics, then compared with the statistical method that tests. Results: 1. The times of tries scored: (l).The position player of CE are higher than the player of such positions as PR, HK, SR, N8, SH etc. *9<05. (2). The position player of WI are higher than the player of such positions as PR, HK, SR, N8, SH, FB etc. *9<05. (3). The position player of PB are higher than the player of such positions as PR, HK, SR, FL, N8, SR etc. *9<05 .2. The times of Conversions scored: (l).The position player of FH was higher than the player of such positions as PR、HK、SR、FL、N8、SR、WI、FB etc. *9<05. (2).The position player of CE was higher than the player of such positions as PR、HK、SR、FL、N8、SH、WI、PB etc. *9<05. (3).The position player of FB was higher then the player of such positions as PR、HK、SR、FL、N8、SH、WI etc. *9<05.3. The times of Penalties scored: The position player of FH and CE were higher than the other position players. *p<05. 4. The times of Drop goals scored: The position player of FR and CE was higher than the other position players. *P<.05. Conclusion: 1 .The highest position players of getting points of tries were WI, CE, FB etc. 2. The most player could be pushed to conversions by the team were FR, CE, FB. 3. The most player could be pushed to penalties by the team were PH, CE. 4. The player that could use the best way to Drop goals was FH.

並列關鍵字

Rugby Tries Conversions Penalties Drop goals

延伸閱讀