“非官方模式”在台日關係中的問題與盲點：兼論台日兩地的海權爭議

The Question and Blind Spot about the ¡Unofficial Model¡ in the Relation of Japan and Taiwan: Takes the Debate on Sea Rights between Japan and Taiwan as an Example

許金彥(Chin-Yen Hsu)

《東亞論壇》 464期 (2009/06) Pp. 35-62

https://doi.org/10.29705/EAR.200906.0004

摘要

自二次大戰結束迄今，己逾六十餘年，而台、日兩地素稱「近鄰遠國」，不論是在自由民主的主觀意識上、抑或是在區域安全的客觀形勢上，兩者雖皆有著高度的交集與緊密的連繫，但雙邊關係透過「非官方模式」以維繫彼此的互動往來卻又長達四十餘年，其箇中原由，頗堪玩味。儘管「非官方模式」在冷戰時期爲台日關係的延續，曾經發揮了積極創新的歷史作用，並且成爲日後美國處理台美關係的參考借鏡；但隨著後冷戰時期的到來，在涉及諸如海權爭議及國家定位等普世性議題的處理上，「非官方模式」則一再暴露了原有功能之侷限，也因而突顯了其欠缺法制化與定型化的特點。本文之目的，即在藉由檢視台日關係與海權爭議的處理問題爲例，以便能爲今後台日的良性互動，提供重新思考的方向。

關鍵字

非官方模式 ； 官方模式 ； 台日關係 ； 海權爭議

並列摘要

The relations between Japan and Taiwan have been very close and important. Both two countries share the same ideology about democracy. For improving the security of the region, they are also interdependent. However, because there are no diplomatic relations between the two countries, the bilateral relation is only improved by the ¡unofficial model¡. In the periods of the Cold War, this unofficial model was used to deal with many issues between these two countries successfully. But there are also many drawbacks in the unofficial model. Particularly in the post-Cold War era, many debates have failed to be resolved by using this unofficial model. This paper also takes the debates on sea rights between Japan and Taiwan as an example and intends to examine the unofficial model.

並列關鍵字

the Unofficial Model ； the Official Model ； the Relations between Japan and Taiwan ； the Debates on Sea Rights

參考文獻

方豪(1994)。台灣早期史綱。台北:台北學生書局。

王俊彥(2000)。戰後台日關係密史。廈門:福建人民出版社。

王冠雄(2005)。主權之爭？抑或漁權之爭？。戰略安全研析。3

朱張碧珠(1990)。國際關係。台北:三民書局。

何思慎(1999)。擺盪在兩岸之間－戰後日本對華政策。台北:東大圖書出版公司。