透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.190.152.38
  • 期刊

CPS教學對國小學生自然領域學習態度、創造力、後設認知與學習成就之影響

A Study on the Relationship between the Leadership of the Preschool Principals and the Job Involvement of Teachers in Taichung City

摘要


本研究旨在探討創造性問題解決教學與一般傳統講解示範教學對國小六年級學童的學習態度、創造力、後設認知及學習成就之影響。研究對象取自臺中縣某國小六年級普通班學生兩班,每班34人共68人,以準實驗研究法,選擇一班爲實驗班進行CPS教學,一班爲控制班採傳統教學,再比較兩種教學法之學習成效。研究工具爲「國小學習態度問卷」、「國小學生創造力量表」、「後設認知量表」、「自然科學習成就測驗」。所得的資料應用t檢定、單因子共變數分析、組內迴歸係數同質性考驗、LSD事後檢定等統計方法,分析實驗班與控制班,經教學實驗後在學習態度、創造力、後設認知及學習成就等四方面之差異,以探討創造性問題解決教學對全體學生所造成之影響,並提出研究的具體建議,供教育及心理輔導與未來相關研究之參考。 本研究發現:實施創造性問題解決教學之後,兩班全體學生在「學習態度」、「創造力」、「後設認知」等方面,實驗班比控制班有顯著的正向提升,但在「成就測驗」及「成就測驗的延宕測驗」部份,實驗班與控制班兩班學生,則未達顯著差異。研究結果發現,創造性問題解決教學對於小六學生自然與生活科技領域的學習態度、創造力、後設認知有顯著的幫助。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of creative problem solving and traditional teaching program on the learning attitude, creativity, metacognition and learning achievement of six-grade regular students. The subjects are two regular six-grade classes with students in each class from Lung-Shan Elementary in Taichung County. One class is assigned as the experimental group, and the other is assigned as the control group. The research tools of <||>Elementary Learning Attitude Scale<||>, <||>Assessment of Creativity for Elementary Students<||>, <||>Assessment of Metacognition<||>, and <||>Assessment of Learning Achievement on Nature Science<||>, are utilized to analyze the difference in learning attitude, creativity, metacognition, and learning achievement of the two groups of students. The results of the study are intended to explore the impact of the creative problem solving teaching program on the students, and to provide theoretical framework and practical suggestion for the educational and counseling program and future research. The findings of this study indicate that the creative problem solving teaching program has a more positive effect on the students from the experimental group than those from the control group, in terms of their <||>learning attitude<||>, <||>creativity<||>, and <||>metacognition<||>. However, there is no significant effect on <||>achievement test<||> and <||>delay test of achievement<||> for all the students. The results of this study suggest that the creative problem solving teaching program would enhance the students' learning attitude, creativity, and metacognition in the fields of nature science and technology.

參考文獻


方俊明(1993)。認知心理學與人格教育。臺北:水牛圖書出版事業有限公司。
毛連塭(1987)。資優教育教學模式。臺北:心理出版社。
王文科(1989)。教育研究的基本性質及其相關概念剖析。特殊教育學報。4,271-303。
王文科(1991)。教育研究法。臺北:五南出版社。
王貴春(2000)。STS教學與國小學生創造力及學習態度之研究。臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。

被引用紀錄


吳曜安(2013)。運用創造性問題解決法融入創意競賽以培養國中生科技創造力之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.00480
吳春慶(2012)。高中生規律運動、學習態度與學業成績關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315272139
林岱瑋(2013)。從八卦系統看從業人員之創造性問題解決模式-以資訊科技從業人員為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0801201418034263
李駿豐(2014)。應用適性化學習系統提升學習成效:以動態鷹架理論為基礎〔碩士論文,國立虎尾科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0028-2507201414063900
張雨勝(2016)。問題導向的STEM課程對高一學生問題解決能力影響之行動研究〔碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0035-1901201715433134

延伸閱讀