運用合作學習及社區實作在兒童相關課程之學習成效

本研究目的為：瞭解運用合作學習及實作經驗在兒童遊戲治療及兒童發展與輔導課程，對大學生學習成效之研究。研究對象為大學生，採行動研究法設計行動方案及收集資料，用同理成份量表及學習動機量表，共收集有效問卷含前後測18及21份，個人作業18份及團體心得作業8份。量性研究資料使用描述性統計分析及相依樣本t檢定，質性資料使用內容分析。研究結果發現：運用合作學習及社區實作在兒童遊戲治療課程時，其同理成份量表之總分及認知驅力（cognitive drive），後測較前測顯著增加（t=2.56；p=.02；t=7.44；p=.00）。在兒童輔導與發展課程顯示：大學生的學習動機及同理能力之前後測無顯著差異（t=1.30；p=.21；t=2.06；p=.05）。質性資料顯示：合作學習促進學業投入、增加同理兒童的認知及情感能力；社區實作促進覺察、理解與反映兒童內在能力及學習動機。結論：合作學習及社區實作可增加學生學習動機及同理能力。研究並根據研究結果修改課程行動方案，建議增加合作學習活動及密集督導實作過程。

關鍵字

兒童相關課程；合作學習；社區實作；學習成效

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore the learning effects of two courses (children play therapy and children development and guidance, respectively) by using cooperative learning and community practice. The research participants were college students. The research was action research. The Learning Motivation Scale (LMS) and Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ) were collected with 18 and 21 copies, including pre-test and post-test. Moreover, 18 personal assignments and eight texts of group reflection assignments were collected from students. The quantitative data were analyzed by descriptive method and paired t-test. The qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. The results were as follows: The ECQ score and the subscale score of cognitive drive in the pre-test and post-test significantly differed ( t = 2.56; p = .02; t = 7.44; p = .00) in the children play therapy course. By contrast, the children development and guidance course using cooperative learning and community practice indicated that LMC and ECQ score in the pre-test and post-test had no significant difference ( t = 1.30; p = .21; t = 2.06; p = .05). From the quality analysis, cooperative learning could improve the college students' schoolwork involvement and prompt their cognitive and emotional empathy toward children; community practice could improve their awareness, understanding, reflection, and learning motivation abilities toward children. Conclusion: cooperative learning and community practice could increase the learning motivation and ability of empathy. Finally, the action project has been revised on the basis of the research results, suggesting that the cooperative learning-related activities and the intensive supervision sessions in practice duration be added accordingly.

並列關鍵字

children curriculums ； cooperative learning ； community practice ； learning effects

參考文獻

周玉楨（2017）：合作學習搭配 Zuvio 即時反饋系統運用於語言學概論教學之研究。應用語文學報，6，35-58。 http://dx.doi.org/10.6906/JAL.201712_(6).0003

高淑貞、蔡群瑞（2009）：遊戲治療師實務困境與因應之探究分析。中華輔導與諮商學報，26，1-45。https://doi.org/10.7082/CJGC.200909.0001

陳文喜（2012）：服務學習教學法對大學生專業課程學習效果之影響。運動知識學報，9，113-129。https://doi.org/10.29596/BGYY.201207.0011

陳舜文、魏嘉瑩（2013）：大學生學習動機之「雙因素模式」：學業認同與角色認同之功能。中華心理學刊，55(1)，41-55。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.20120717

楊愛施（2009）：應用合作學習教學範例於英語 EFL 的教室。明道學術論壇，5(2)，97-112。http://dx.doi.org/10.6953/MJ.200912.0097

主題瀏覽