排球扣球攻擊型態之進攻成效研究

扣球攻擊在排球比賽中為得分主要手段，亦為進攻最有效武器，扣球攻擊成功率為影響比賽勝負最大關鍵，而不同類別扣球攻擊型態可能對比賽造成不同影響。本研究旨在探討排球扣球攻擊型態之進攻成效情形，以2002年亞運男排賽前六強之22場比賽為研究對象，透過錄影帶反覆三次判讀，得到重要結論包括(1)、冠軍韓國隊及殿軍大陸隊最高扣球成效為3號位扣球，其他隊伍戰術攻擊皆為最高成效。各隊在最低扣球成效上略有岐異。(2)、各類扣球攻擊型態成效差異情形而言，印度隊或整體六隊之3號位扣球及戰術攻擊型態顯高於其他類別。(3)、整體六隊之2號位扣球在－攻與反攻時攻擊火力相去甚多。而「3號位和球」與「戰術攻擊」為進攻得分之鑰。(4)、六隊間進攻成效情形而言，發現4號位扣球時，冠軍韓國隊及亞軍伊朗隊明顯高於第四名中國隊及第五名印度隊。

關鍵字

排球；扣球攻擊型態；進攻成效；亞運會

並列摘要

The Spike was the main point-gainning and the most effective offensive skill. The success rate of the spike styles might influence the game result to some extent. The purpose of this study was to investigate the offensive effect of spike style. The subjects were 22 games played by the top 6 teams in the Men's Volleyball of 2002 Asian Games. After three times video tape review, the important conclusions were deprived as the follows: (1) The highest effect was 'No. 3 area spike' in the 1(superscript st) (Korea) and 4(superscript th) prize (China), and so was 'lactic attack' in the other teams. All the teams were quite different in the lowest effect. (2) As for the difference in the effect of spike style, 'No. 3 area spike' and 'tactic attack' were significantly higher than the other category in India and all the teams. (3)Among the six teams, there were significant difference of 'No. 2 area spike' between sideout and transition offensive. 'No. 3 area spike' and 'lactic attack' were the key of getting-point. (4) In 'No. 4 area spike', the 1(superscript st) (Korea) and 2(superscript nd) (Iran) were significantly higher than the 4(superscript th) (China) and 5(superscript th) (India).