透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.21.97.61
  • 期刊

消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約任擇議定書之實踐與婦女權利保障

Practice of CEDAW Optional Protocol and Protection of Women's Rights

摘要


本文透過分析消除婦女歧視委員會對於申訴程序及詢問程序之實踐,以理解其對《消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約》有關婦女權利保障之影響,並期待能對於台灣未來實踐此公約有所助益及供以借鏡。消除婦女歧視委員會迄今只審理了十件個人申訴案件,此結果確實令人感到難以理解。不過在五個已做成實質決定之案件中,消除婦女歧視委員會並不保守,其已積極致力於藉由個人案件之審理,進一步保障婦女權利。就詢問程序案件而言,消除婦女歧視委員會只進行一件詢問程序案件,從數量上而言,實在難以令人滿意。而就此案件之內容觀之,消除婦女歧視委員會確已盡力進行調查,並指出確實有嚴重且集體性的違反《消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約》之情形。對於台灣而言,當「消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約施行法」通過後,適用《消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約》時應參照消除婦女歧視委員會對公約之解釋,因此對於這些解釋之理解,將有助於此公約之國內實踐。

並列摘要


This essay examines what the impact of works of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (the Committee) on the protection of rights in the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (the Convention) is by analysis of the Committee's practice of communication and inquiry procedures.Concerning communication procedure it is quite difficult to understand why the Committee reviewed only ten cases. However, it can be found that, in the five cases with substantial decisions, the Committee was not conservative, but to protect women's rights positively.The Committee conducted only one inquiry case, which was few. But the Committee held comprehensive investigations and found that there was severe and systematic violation of the Convention.For Taiwan, as the Act to Implement the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women is passed, the Committee's interpretation of the Convention will have to be made reference. Therefore understanding of such interpretations will be helpful to domestic implementation of the Convention.

參考文獻


行政院全球資訊網,行政院會通過「消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約施行法」草案,2010年5月13日,(last visited 2010-12-15)。
行政院送立法院審議之消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約施行法草案,(last visited 2010-12-15)。
何碧珍(2008)。推動我國加入CEDAW的策略與努力。研考雙月刊。32(4),43-53。
廖福特(2004)。理想的建立失落與重建─消除婦女歧視公約及其議定書。政大法學評論。82,1-41。

被引用紀錄


張涵茵(2015)。從女性主義觀點分析CEDAW在我國公部門之落實〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614012667

延伸閱讀