透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.135.58
  • 期刊

比較孟加拉灣海域劃界案:200浬外大陸礁層界限之發展

Comparing the delimitation cases in the Bay of Bengal: Development of the outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles

摘要


印度洋北部的孟加拉灣,由於富有天然資源,使得沿岸國家產生海域劃界與資源爭奪的爭端。經多次談判未果,孟加拉即尋求國際司法機構解決爭端。本文藉由比較2012年《孟加拉與緬甸於孟加拉灣海域劃界爭端案》與2014年《孟加拉與印度於孟加拉灣劃界案》,並檢視其相關法規解釋與劃界方法、大陸礁層之「自然延伸原則」與「灰區」之內容,分析出「等距/相關情況劃界法」三階段原則為目前達成衡平結果最重要之劃界方法。另有關200浬外大陸礁層之界限亦可透過三階段劃界方法來劃定。最後關於灰區,則是要靠爭端國合作或達成協議才能有效分出其權利及義務。

並列摘要


The Bay of Bengal is in the northern part of the Indian Ocean. For the reason that this area is full of natural resources, coastal states have been involving in disputes concerning maritime delimitation and resources competition. After many unsuccessful negotiations, Bangladesh sought to resolve the dispute through international judicial institutions. This article compare s "Delimitat ion of the Maritime Boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/ Myanmar)" in 2012 and "Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between Bangladesh and India" in 2014, and reviews interpretations of the relevant laws and regulations, maritime delimitation methods, the principle of "natural prolongation" of the continental shelf and the "grey area". It then analyzes the "equidistance/relevant circumstances method" that involves three stages and argues that the most important method for achieving an equitable result is this three-stage method. This method can also be used for delimiting the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles. Finally, the settlement in the grey area must rely on international cooperation or adopting an agreement for effectively separating theirs rights and obligations by the disputed states.

參考文獻


姜皇池(2004)。國際海洋法。新學林。
陳荔彤(2008)。國際海洋法論。元照。
黃異(2017)。國際海洋法。新學林。
丁鐸、林杞(2018)。200 海里以外大陸架外部界限劃定中的自然延伸原则—兼評孟加拉灣海洋劃界案。國際法研究。2018(1),14-30。
姚瑩(2015)。2014 年孟加拉與印度孟加拉灣劃界案評述—兼論對中菲南海仲裁案的啟示。當代法學。2015(4),149-160。

延伸閱讀