- 期刊
- OpenAccess
How to Measure Time Preferences: An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods
並列摘要
In two studies, time preferences for financial gains and losses at delays of up to 50 years were elicited using three different methods: matching, fixed-sequence choice titration, and a dynamic ”staircase” choice method. Matching is found to create fewer demand characteristics and to produce better fits with the hyperbolic model of discounting. The choice-based measures are shown to better predict real-world outcomes such as smoking and payment of credit card debt. No consistent advantages are found for the dynamic staircase method over fixed-sequence titration.
延伸閱讀
- 蔡欣穎（2014）。Comparison of statistical methods for gene set enrichment tests〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.00444
- 古以恩（2006）。Performance Evaluation of Timeslice Management Mechanisms〔碩士論文，國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2006.00490
- Oyetunji, E. (2009). Some Common Performance Measures in Scheduling Problems: Review Article. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 1(2), 6-9. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=20407467-200908-201009060079-201009060079-6-9
- Kao, C. H. (2009). Two methods to improve the performance of a scatterometer [master's thesis, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.02122
- Doyle, J. R. (2013). Survey of Time Preference, Delay Discounting Models. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(2), 116-135. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=19302975-201303-201502040025-201502040025-116-135