不同羽球教學法對正手拍高遠長球擊球效果之研究

本研究目的在比較三種不同教學法對羽球正手拍高遠長球擊球效果之研究。方法以羽球興趣選項3班75位女學生為研究對象（平均年齡20.55±0.57歲，身高161.04±8.82公分），採用隨機分配分三組1、羽球筒組2、揮空拍組3、吊羽球組。教學設計分二階段：第一階段：先進行無實際擊球動作，僅練習正手拍高遠長球的動作次序。每次練習一分鐘，中間休息一分鐘，共練習三次。第二階段：為實際擊球練習由餵球者進行餵球，以五人一組採循環方式進行，每人每次擊二十球後換下一位，共練習六次共擊120顆球。教學時程總共十二週，並實施學前、學後與保留測驗。實驗結果之統計分析，分別以單因子變異數分析，考驗羽球筒組、揮空拍組與吊羽球組之均質性，學後及保留成績的差異性；受試者之學前、學後及保留測驗的擊球高度的差異性若F值達顯著水準，則再進行杜凱式法事後比較。另以皮爾遜積差相關法分析擊球成績與擊球點的相關性。結果顯示：一、羽球筒組的擊球成績表現均顯著於揮空拍組與吊羽球組。二、學後及保留階段的擊球點高於學前擊球點且達顯著水準。三、擊球成績與擊球點有顯著的正相關。因此建議教學時可將羽球筒視為練習正手拍高遠長球的一種輔助教材之一，以增進羽球技能的學習效果。

關鍵字

羽球筒；揮空拍；吊羽球

並列摘要

The aim of current study is to compare the efficiency of three kinds of teaching aids on striking forehand high clear shots. The experiment is conducted with three classes of female students of totally 75 people. The subjects have an average age of 20.55±0.57 years old and height of 161.04±8.82 centimeters. They are divided randomly into three groups, badminton tube group, racket swinging group and hanged badminton shuttle group. The instructional design is divided into two phases: for the first phase, students only practice the moves of striking forehand high clear shots without shuttle. The practice is done for three rounds, each round lasts 1 minute with 1 minute break in between. For the second phase, an assistant feeds the shuttle to students. Students are divided into groups of five, each of the five students strikes 20 shots and take turns. The practice is done for six rounds, which means students have practiced 120 shots totally. The course lasts 12 weeks with pretest, posttest and retention test. The experimental result is first analyzed with One-Way ANOVA to test (a) the homogeneity of badminton tube group, racket swinging group and hanged badminton shuttle group, and (b) the difference between the scores of posttest and retention test. If the difference of stroke height between pretest, posttest and retention test showed significance in F-test, then additional posteriori comparison is made with Tukey test adopted. In addition, Pearson's product-moment correlation is introduced to analyze the correlation between score and contact point. The result of analysis showed that (a) students reached significantly higher score after practicing with badminton tube compared with swinging racket and hitting hanged badminton shuttle. (b) The contact point of posttest and retention test is significantly higher than that of pretest. (c) A significantly positive correlation is observed between score and contact point. As a result, the author suggests that badminton tube be adopted as a supporting teaching aid of practicing forehand high clear shot and help students to learn badminton more efficiently.