透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.23.123
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

國立臺灣大學學生體育課程目標認知與學生學習滿意度之研究

The Study of Physical Education Curriculum of National Taiwan University

摘要


本研究以臺灣大學近年體育課程變革與體育課程實施現況為背景,探討學生對現行體育課程滿意程度以及課程目標認知程度的理解。本研究以問卷調查方式進行,採取隨機取樣方式選取100學年度修習「運動專項學群」大二以上的學生進行問卷施測,有效問卷為1953份,男性學生993位,佔全體人數51%,女性學生960位,佔全體49%。結論分為以下五點說明:(一)學生所認知的體育課程目標仍是以健康身心適能、運動技能與知識培養為重;(二)學生對目前體育課程偏向「滿意」,且有約60%學生表示修習完四科體育課程後仍有意願修習選修體育課程;(三)修課考量主要受到個人運動興趣、課程內容以及自我體能狀況評估等因素影響,而教師給分方式對於學生選課意願影響較低;(四)學生認為課程項目應朝多元化方面發展,拓展課程多元性;(五)由於新行修課規範,近四成學生表示對新課程並不了解,且有55%學生對課程改制並無意見。並提出三方向的建議,分別為(一)體育課程開課方向規劃之多元化;(二)體育課程修習制度宣導;(三)體育課程目標與內容建構系列研究之延續。

並列摘要


The purposes of this study were to understand the present situation of HRPE curriculum of NTU, and probe for students' satisfaction, understanding and expectation toward PE curriculum. In this study, 1953 participants were recruited to complete a questionnaire, all participants were sophomore who is taking PE course this semester. In concluded, participants perceived health related physical fitness and mental wellness, sport skills and sport related knowledge were the most important aims of PE curriculum. And, the participants inclined to feel satisfy with PE curriculum, there were nearly 60% of participant willing to take more PE courses after complete require credits. The consideration of course taken was influenced by personal interests, the content of curriculum and personal physical condition. Participants deemed that course should be more varied. As for new regulation of curriculum study, nearly 40% presented not familiar with new regulation, and there were 55% have no comment with it. The suggestions were made in three aspects. Firstly, to expand multiple PE courses; secondly, to reinforce the announcement of PE curriculum study regulation; thirdly, to continue studies that related PE curriculum construction.

參考文獻


李志峰(2010)。大葉大學大學生體育課程、運動設施需求與教學滿意度、選課考量因素之研究。人文暨社會科學期刊。6(2),23-34。
周宏室編(2002)。運動教育學。臺北市:師大書苑。
林惟鐘、黎玉東(2010)。國立臺北科技大學知新生對休閒運動的認知與現況之研究。台北科技大學學報。43(2),113-122。
林陶(2008)。中日體育教師培養的技術課程標準比較分析。體育學刊。15(11),58-62。
國立臺灣大學體育室()。,未出版。

延伸閱讀