透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.93.73
  • 期刊

謝勒真理觀對孔恩科學觀能有的提示

Truth in Science-A Possible Response from Max Scheler's Theory of Truth to Thomas Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Revolution

摘要


謝勒在其有生之年雖未曾與孔恩相遇而懇談科學真理的義涵,但謝勒的科學觀與真理觀可充份地回應孔恩對科學發展史上所提出之「不可共量性」這一議題,因為謝勒秉持着任何學科之真理都有其絕對性與相對性,在對相對的時、空、文化中仍有其永恆不變的一面。

關鍵字

科學 真理 相對性 絕對性 不可共量性

並列摘要


E ven though Max Scheler (1874-1928) dies prematurely before he can confront Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) in the latter's position concerning the idea of incommensurability within the history of scientific revolution, nevertheless, Scheler's reflection on scientific knowledge as well as on truth may be sufficient enough to give an adequate response to Kuhn to appease his doubt about the relativity of scientific truth.

並列關鍵字

Science Truth Relativity Absoluteness Incommensurability

參考文獻


Kuhn, Thomas S.(1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Scheler, Max(1973).Selected Philosophical Essays.Evanston:Northwestern University Press.
關永中(2005)。與謝勒懇談真理的絕對性與相對性。輔仁宗教研究。12
Lonergan, Bernard(1980).Understanding and Being.New York:The Edwin Mellen Press.
Lonergan, Bernard(1957).Insight: a Study of Human Understanding.New York:Philosophical Library.

被引用紀錄


張世龍(2013)。J. Dewey在Chicago早期的知識脈絡之闡釋〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.10090

延伸閱讀