透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.129.67.26
  • 期刊

花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估指標之研究

A Study of Constructing Evaluation Indicators for Health-Promtion-Oriented Long Stay Community in Hualien

摘要


本研究欲將健康促進概念與長宿休閒發展結合,做為花蓮地區發展獨具特色之長宿休閒社區之參考,其主要目的為建構一套客觀評估花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估之指標及探討評估指標相對重要性並對花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒提出建議。 首先透過文獻回顧與探討,瞭解國內外長宿休閒與健康促進之意涵,彙整出具有顯著性之指標因子,初擬各項花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估指標內容,再以德爾菲專家問春之測訪,架構出適用於花蓮地區發展健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估指標體系,主要分為三個層級,分別由「生活機能資源」、「休閒遊憩資源」和「健康促進資源」等三個構面加以探討,並列出十四個評估因子和五十個操作性指標。 分析結果得知下列重要結論:一、第一層級的各構面中以「生活機能資源」最受重視;在第二層的評估因子中,居住設施選擇與收費、安全維護措拖、食物新鮮安全、交通便利性及自然與人文資源等因子皆屬相對重要。二、健康促進型長宿休閒社區評估指標的健康促進資源構面和其評估指標在相對權重中所佔比重雖不高,但其構面為花蓮地區發展長宿休閒有別其他地區之重要特色,與生活機能資源和休閒道憩資源相比之下,並非亟需注重之項目,但仍相當值得重視。

並列摘要


Awakened of health conscious make human beside of hoping to live a good quality lifestyle also expect that their living environment is including the conditions of health-promote and health-preservation. Long-stay in Taiwan is limited by the least differentiate between geographical, weather and environment conditions. The aim of this study is to combine the concept of health-promote and the development of long stay to construct evaluation indicators for Health-Promote Long Stay community in Hualien. Based on a literature review, this involve analyzing the meaning of long stay and health-Promote, categorized the stimulus factors, imitate the content of the evaluation indicators for health-promote long stay community, using the Delphi Technique to frame out an evaluation indicators for health-promote long stay community which involve three hierarchies: vital function resources, leisure amusement resources, health-promote resources, and listed out 14 evaluation factors and 50 operational indicators. Followed by using questionnaire survey to assemble the perspectives of the professionals in health-promote and Long stay career, the related government officers, and the firms in Hualien which had been accommodated the Long Stay experiencing group, through using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to calculate the significance for all indicators, and get important conclusions as below: The first, the aspects in the first hierarchy place an importance on vital function resources; the evaluation indicators in the second hierarchy make much of the choice and charge for the living facilities, security maintenances, fresh and safety food, convenient of communications, nature and humanism resources. The second, the ration between the significance of health-promote aspects and its evaluation indicators in the evaluation indicators for Health-Promote Long Stay community is not high, but its aspects are an important character for Hualien which differ from other community on the development of Long Stay, when compare with health-promote resources, leisure amusement resources, it is not the item to be starved of but still need to pay attention with.

參考文獻


方乃玉(2006)。建構台灣發展日本銀髮族國外長宿休閒評估指標之研究(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所。
寺井融(2005)。亞洲海外長宿論。台北:中華民國物流協會。
宇野一雄、胡忠一譯()。,未出版。
宇野一雄、胡忠一譯()。
台灣 Long Stay 預定示範地區現場調查報告

被引用紀錄


郭書吟(2012)。民宿設置評估指標系統之研究〔碩士論文,國立高雄餐旅大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6825/NKUHT.2012.00034
劉可芳(2014)。熟年世代對長宿休閒的屬性偏好及市場區隔之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.11254

延伸閱讀