- 期刊
核心課程與分類課程選修的比較－從哈佛大學通識課程改革說起
Comparisons of Core Curriculum and Distribution Requirement: Reflections Based on Harvard's Recent Reform on General Education
並列摘要
”Core curriculum” and ”distribution requirement” are two forms of general education implementation. Harvard University passed a report on general education reform in May 2007, replacing the core curriculum by ”general education courses.” Many people be1iev that Harvard has chosen to back to the distribution requirement. This paper examines and compares the above two forms of general education courses, with reference to the development of Harvard's general education courses. The paper concludes by arguing that (1) Harvard's recent reform leads to a compromise of the two forms and (2) the idea of general education which a university endorses, not the form of the courses, is the key to the success of general education implementation.
被引用紀錄
張志謙（2011）。我國大學生對通識課程之學習動機與學習滿意度研究〔碩士論文，中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201100474
宋宥賢、李佩珊、張聖杰（2018）。初任國民中小學專任輔導教師職前培訓方案的參與經驗與需求評估之初探研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，(51)，217-262。https://doi.org/10.3966/172851862018040051007
延伸閱讀
- 陳杏枝、游家政（2015）。核心課程？還是分類選修？：某私立綜合大學通識教育課程架構改革之研究。教育研究集刊，(61:1)，69-100。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082015036101003
- 陳幼慧（2009）。核心課程之改革：哈佛大學通識教育改革之研究。通識教育學刊，(4)，39-61。https://doi.org/10.6360/TJGE.200912.0039
- Po-chang Chen（1982）。哈伯瑪斯的「批判解釋學」（Critical Hermeneutics）及其對課程研究的啟示。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，()，73-134。https://doi.org/10.6910/BGIENTNU.198206_(24).0003
- 俞慧芸、周淑卿（2009）。哈佛爲什麼是哈佛？－商管教育以參與者爲中心的學習法。商管科技季刊，10(1)，185-196。https://doi.org/10.30083/CMQ.200903.0007
- Satterfield, J. W., Gonzales, L., & Zelanek, S. (2009). The Organization and Administration of a Deficit Curriculum: The Dominant Operating Core Curriculum of a Hispanic Serving Educational System. Academic Leadership Journal, 7(3), 83-88. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=15337812-200901-201101260049-201101260049-83-88