白話文學與文學革命－重探胡適《白話文學史》

Vernacular Literature and Literary Revolution: Hu Shi's History of Vermicular Literature Reconsidered

劉芝慶(Jhih-Ching Liu)

《長庚人文社會學報》 4卷1期 (2011/04) Pp. 193-222

https://doi.org/10.30114/CGJHSS.201104.0006

摘要

在書寫文學史的歷程中，胡適《白話文學史》往往被視爲典範之作，而胡適提出的觀點與主張，固然有可議之處，但也對後來的文學史書寫方向造成了許多影響。在這樣的認知之上，本文要追問的是，胡適怎麼建構了文學史？怎麼在「歷史」中突出「白話文學」？這種歷史的探溯，與胡適「當下」的「文學革命」又有什麼樣的關係？更進一步來講，文學革命與白話文學的結合，促成了胡適以文學爲中心，並進而由文學關聯到其它層面的文學史思考，這種思維架構，也深刻地反映在後來的文學史觀與著作。

關鍵字

胡適 ； 文學革命 ； 白話文學史 ； 文言

並列摘要

In the course of literary history writing, Hu Shi's History of Vernacular Literature is often regarded as a paradigm. Although his points of view and ideas seem to be debatable, they do influence the writing of literary history. Based on this observation, the present essay intends to examine how did Hu Shi construct the literary history and how did he highlight the category of ”vernacular literature” in the ”historical” scope. Besides, this paper also wants to discuss how is this historical exploration related to his ”contemporary literary revolution.” To be more precise, the combination of literary revolution and vernacular literature results in Hu Shi's particular way of thinking about literary history, which centers on literature and furthermore connects itself with other historical dimensions. Such a thinking framework has been reflected in the later works concerning literary history.

並列關鍵字

Hu Shi ； Literary Revolution ； History of Vernacular Literature ； Classical Chinese

參考文獻

王文仁(2007)。近現代中國文學進化史觀之生成與影響(博士論文)。國立東華大學中國語文學系。

王汎森(2008)。近代中國的史家與史學。香港:三聯。

王宏志編、陳國球編、陳清僑編(1997)。書寫文學的過去─文學史思考。臺北:麥田出版社。

羊達之 (1937)，《中國文學史提要》，南京：正中書局。

宋千儀(2007)。胡適新文學理論的古典因素。萬竅通識學報。6，53-72。