透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.22.242.141
  • 期刊

原住民參與審判-原住民審判主體地位的建立

Indigenous People's Participation in Judiciary-The Establishment of Indigenous People's Subjective Position for Judicial Power

摘要


作者作為一個實務工作者,觀察到我國國民參與審判意識高漲,原住民專屬法院或法庭遲遲無法設立的困境。當原住民自治立法裹足不前且未及於司法權,既有主流社會法院組織架構難以撼動下,為改變原住民向來淪為主流族群司法審判制度的客體地位,回應原住民對於司法審判權力民主正當化的需求,解決原住民專屬法院或法庭立法設計的缺失,具體實踐國民參與審判的理念,作者謹藉此文提出一個務實及可行的宣言,就是在原住民訴訟中納入原住民作為審判主體,現有的職業法官加上原住民共同形成審判主體,以原漢對話共治的運作模式來保留及回復原住民固有規範價值,同時塑造屬於原住民群體的法律意識。

關鍵字

無資料

並列摘要


As a legal professional, the author found both heated enthusiasm for citizen participation in the judiciary and delay for the establishment of indigenous specialized court. While the self-government legislation for indigenous people is stagnant and takes no judicial power into account, it seems hopeless for indigenous people to escape from the judicial system constructed by the Han people's values. Nevertheless, the present judicial reform for citizen participation provides an opportunity to review the possibility of establishing an indigenous people's subjective position for judicial power. To justify judicial power over indigenous people, to respond the necessity for participation in judicial power, to change the long-term objective position, and to solve the flaws of the design of an indigenous specialized court, the author argues that Taiwan must first establish indigenous people's share of judicial power. Let indigenous people join judges in presiding over cases regarding them. Through a dialogue between indigenous people and the mainstream Han people during the joint operation of judicial power, indigenous people's legal values can be therefore maintained or reshaped.

並列關鍵字

無資料

參考文獻


王泰升()。,未出版。
王寓中、曾韋禎、謝文華、項程鎮、楊國文。2011。〈爭議法官邵燕玲馬提名大法官〉《自由時報》。3 月31 日。頭版新聞版。(http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/mar/31/today-t1.htm)(2012/8/17)
王嵩山(2000)。原住民─人族的文化旅程。台北:遠足台灣。

被引用紀錄


侯憶萍(2017)。人民參與審判制度之研究— 以陪審制與參審制之比較為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703107

延伸閱讀