網球團隊雙教練模式下的運作－以布爾迪厄觀點探知

一般網球教練事務很多，不單單只是訓練而已，還要應付球隊行政跟團隊人員間的各種瑣事，因此在經費充足的狀況之下，便會多聘請教練來幫忙，所以普遍大家對雙教練模式下的團隊都是看好的，認為其團隊一定會有發展性，但並不知其中的辛苦且複雜的關係。從過去筆者不論在選手身份或現在教練身份，都深受其教練間的問題影響，直到真實遭遇到雙教練間一連串的起伏，從團隊快速進步到停滯不前、球員離隊等問題，因此研究者將對此教練間帶來的現象進行釐清。本文以布爾迪厄（Pierre Bourdieu,1930-2002）的資本、慣習、場域三觀點，釐清雙教練模式在球隊社會的實踐，反省後重新分析兩位教練之間的互動關係。深入研究我們可以發現兩位教練一直處於某種對比和共存，相互矛盾的處境下，得以了解個人累積的能量（象徵資本）、競技的殘酷（慣習）、生存的球場（場域）等內容的重要性，有一個全新的觀點解釋雙教練模式的互動關係。

關鍵字

網球團隊；雙教練模式

並列摘要

The tennis coaches do not only train, but also have to tackle the trifles coming from the administration staff and team members. Hence, if budget permits, the school will hire more coaches for assistance. As a result, most people think that the double coach mode is promising, and that the team will be more developed. However, they would not understand how intricate it is underlying in the relationship. Thus, the researchers will clarify the phenomenon brought by the coaches. This study departed from Pierre Bourdieu's theoretical tools such as capital, habitus and field. We clarifies how the tennis team society is practiced under the double coach model and then reexamined the interaction between the two coaches after introspection. As we found that the two coaches have been paradoxically situated between contrast and coexistence. This permits readers to understand the importance of individual energy (symbol capital), the cruelty of competitions (habitus), the survival of the stadium (field), and then exhibits a new point of view to explain the interaction of the double coach model.