學生擬題教學對情意學習成效及學業成就影響之後設分析

Effects of the Problem Posing Strategies of Students on Affective Learning Outcomes and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis

廖遠光(Yuen-Kuang Liao) ； 張澄清(Cheng-Ching Chang)

《教育科學研究期刊》 61卷3期 (2016/09) Pp. 1-42

https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(3).01

摘要

本研究應用後設分析法探討學生擬題教學對於提升情意及學業成就之效果，並試圖探討可能影響教學成效的變數。以擬題、出題、problem posing、problem generation、problem writing、problem formulation 為關鍵詞，至「臺灣博碩士論文」、「CETD 中文碩博士論文」、「臺灣期刊論文索引」及「CEPS 中文電子期刊」等資料庫檢索相關文獻，共蒐集擬題教學成效之實驗研究31 篇，可提供情意學習17 筆及學業成就34 筆之效果量，計有2,421 個樣本納入分析。研究結果顯示，學生擬題教學對於情意及學業成就具有正向效應，整體效果量分別為0.34 及0.57。意即對於情意及學業成就的提升，皆優於傳統講述式教學法，且對於學業成就的提升效果更佳。情意學習會受到「學科領域」、「教學者偏誤」、「擬題次數」及「網路擬題」等變數之調節作用而呈現差異；學業成就的調節變數則有「學習階段」、「學科領域」、「教學者偏誤」、「課程時數」及「分組學習」等。

關鍵字

出題 ； 後設分析 ； 情意學習成效 ； 學業成就 ； 擬題

並列摘要

A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research that investigated the effects of problem-posing strategies on the affective learning outcomes and academic achievement of students in Taiwan. We adopted problem posing, problem generation, problem writing, and problem formulation as keywords and gathered 31 studies (comprising 17 comparisons for the affective domain and 34 comparisons for academic achievement), converting their quantitative data to effect size (ES). The results demonstrated that problem posing strategies provided considerable benefits than traditional instruction did on students' affective learning outcomes (ES = 0.34) and academic achievement (ES = 0.57), and the larger positive effect sizes showed the benefit is greater on academic achievement. In addition, four moderator variables were selected for investigating affective learning outcomes and five moderator variables were selected for investigating academic achievement (including subject area, instructor bias, total number of courses, and cooperative learning), all of which had statistically significant impacts on the mean ES. Finally, the noteworthy suggestions and limitations of this study were discussed.

並列關鍵字

academic achievement ； affective learning outcome ； meta-analysis ； problem posing ； question posing

參考文獻

安蓮心（2011）。網路學生出題策略輔助外籍生華語學習之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。【An, Y.-S. (2011). The study of online student-generated questions strategies on assisting foreign students with Chinese learning (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.】

林宜篇、于富雲（2012）。學生網路出題教學策略對國小學生生命教育學習成效之影響。新竹教育大學教育學報，28（2），29-56。【Lin, Y.-P., & Yu, F.-Y. (2012). The effects of an online student-generated questions strategy on elementary student learning of life education. Educational Journal of NHCUE, 28(2), 29-56.】

洪琮琪、于富雲、程炳林（2005）。網路出題與合作學習策略運用對學力提昇與學習焦慮之影響。新竹師院學報，20，219-244。【Hung, C.-C., Yu, F.-Y., & Cherng, B.-L. (2005). Effects of question-posing and cooperative learning on students' competency and learning anxiety within a web-based learning environment. Journal of National Hsinchu Teachers College, 20, 219-244.】

秦嘉智（2012）。問題題型結構之擬題教學對國小六年級學生分數乘除文字題解題成就之影響（未出版碩士論文）。中原大學，桃園縣。【Cin, J.-J. (2012). The influence of problem-posing instruction based on problem types structure toward sixth-graders’ solving achievement on word problems of multiplication and divison of fraction (Unpublished master’s thesis). Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan County, Taiwan.】

楊晏婷（2011）。瀏覽出題機制融入網路學生出題歷程對國中英語學習影響之探究（未出版碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。【Yang, Y.-T. (2011). The effects of online student question-generation with access to peers’ generated questions on junior high school students’ learning in English (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.】