師資養成公費制度之歷史探究

A Historical Approach on the Government-Funded System for Teacher Preparation

黃嘉莉(Jia-Li Huang)

《教育科學研究期刊》 64卷2期 (2019/06) Pp. 99-129

https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0004

摘要

本研究以1994年《師資培育法》為準，區分為國家以公費培育整體師資的「師範教育公費制度」，以及公費培育部分師資的「師資培育公費制度」，探究公費制度發展之設計目的、演進及其限制。經過歷史探究後，歸納之結論如下：一、公費制度設計目的從養成國家教師再到均衡區域師資，其功能包括吸引優秀人才穩定教師素質與促進社會流動；二、隨著社會環境變遷，師資培育公費制度包括公費待遇、服務義務、賠償公費等規定，與師範教育公費制度的原先設計差異不大；三、師範教育公費制度的舊問題延續至師資培育公費制度，包括公費制度未因師資培育模式不同而免其存在受到質疑、培養教師專業知能與態度功能有限及公費制度吸引優秀人才有限，使其新制度是否能解決均衡區域師資的目的，仍有待檢驗。

關鍵字

公費制度 ； 師資培育公費制度 ； 師範教育公費制度

並列摘要

This study used Taiwan's Teacher Education Act of 1994 as a cut-point for distinguishing normal education (fully funded) and teacher education (partially funded) government-funded systems, examining the design concept and limitation of government-funded systems. This study's findings of a historical approach analysis are: (1) The objective of developing the government-funded systems is to prepare national teachers during normal education stage and strive for regional equity in the context of teacher education openness; the function of government-funded is to attract talents and promote social mobility. (2) The treatment, obligation, and compensation of government-funded of teacher education were little difference in time between normal education and teacher education with social change. (3) Limitations on the design of the government-funded system during normal education to current in diversity teacher education are the existence of government-funded system is questioned, the limitation to prepare perspective teachers' professional knowledge and competence, and the limitation of attraction to talent. The goal of new institution to equalize the teacher quality between different regional is still be reviewed in the future. As a result, the paper offers some suggestions that focus on the limits of government-funded teacher education through perspectives after historical analysis to be as reference for revising relative institution.

並列關鍵字

government-funded system ； government-funded system of normal education ； government-funded system of teacher education

參考文獻

彭煥勝（2011）。我國小學師資培育政策的百年回顧與前瞻。市北教育學刊，39，79-102。【Peng, H.-S. (2011). A centennial review and prospect of the elementary school teacher education policy in the Republic of China (Taiwan). Journal of Education of Taipei Municipal University of Education, 39, 79-102. 】

黃嘉莉（2016b）。第一期卓越師資培育獎學金學生教學準備度之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，12（1），1-38。【Huang, J.-L. (2016b). A study on the teaching preparedness of students funded by project for excellent teacher education scholarship (the first phase). Journal of Educational Research and Development, 12(1), 1-38. 】

熊瑞梅、紀金山（2002）。「師資培育法」形成的政策範疇影響力機制。臺灣社會學，4，199-246。【Syong, R.-M., & Chi, C.-S. (2002). The influence on forming policy domain of Teacher Education Act of 1994. Taiwanese Sociology, 4, 199-246. 】

Apple, M. W. (2001). Markets, standards, teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 182-196.

David, P. A. (2007). Path dependence: A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica, 1(2), 91-114.