透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.165.246
  • 期刊

邁向安寧緩和醫療的新一頁

The Next Era of Palliative Care in Taiwan: A Look at Where We Have Been and Where We May Go

摘要


現代安寧緩和醫療肇始於1967年,而臺灣安寧療護的理念則萌芽於1983年,至今亦有逾二十年歷史。在臺灣安寧療護的催生與茁壯過程當中,善終善生的「四全照護」一直是發展的核心。最近三讀通過的第三次《安寧緩和醫療條例》相關修法、社會上積極推動的「預立醫療自主計畫」、以及拒絕急救相關之生命教育與臨終倫理決策,都是近年來安寧照護法規制度上力求完備的確據,也是未來此領域的重要議題。當今安寧緩和醫療的時代使命,是凝聚尖端科技,以科學驗證(evidence base)的研究成果來拒絕臨床上的無效醫療(medical futility),立基在科技、知識及技巧來整合流行病學、症狀學及育成新藥,目的在緩解生命中的苦難,增進末期病人的福祉。隨著時代的潮流法令不斷再修正,民眾接受安寧相關教育的普及化,身為安寧療護從業人員所面對的挑戰也更多元,臺灣的安寧緩和醫療正邁向新的一頁。

並列摘要


Originated from the linguistic root "hospitality," the term ''hospice'' in medieval time referred to an oasis for the weary on a long enervating journey. Created by Dr. Dame Cicely Saunders in 1948, hospice today is far more beyond a facility for terminally ill patientsit now stands for a mission, applying evidence-based knowledge and employing the stateof- the-art technology, a specialized care to ease patient suffering, provide comfort, and help find peace and dignity at the end of life. The goal is to meet not only physical , but also psycho-social, spiritual and cultural needs of both dying patients and their families. Pioneered in 1967, palliative care in Taiwan has evolved and modified through time to include modern societal meanings, yet the mission to center on ultimate humanity remains. Medical futility, however, as a well-established basis for withdrawing and withholding lifesustaining treatment, continues to be an ongoing clinical controversy that complicates the time point Taiwanese initiating hospice/palliative care. In addition, in the past decade the dying population who received palliative care has enlarged to comprise not only cancer Uueaupatients but also that of other diseases. Palli ative care in the new era quickly progresses and the innovative service of psycho-oncology emerges as well. In accordance with the recent third reading of Hospice Palliative Care Regulation Amendment, the govemmentpromoted "Advance Care Planning" helps clarify patients' medical preference, reduce futile possibilities, and further ensure their dignity and quality of death. While there are expected challenges and certain cultural barriers on the way for each Taiwan citizen to achieve "a good death," palliative care providers shall persist with their efforts to complete this mission.

參考文獻


胡文郁、楊嘉玲(2009)。生命末期之病情告知與預立照護計畫。護理雜誌。56(1),23-28。
孫效智(2009)。漸凍人氣切的倫理與法律問題。政治與社會哲學評論。28,177-200。
孫效智(2012)。安寧緩和醫療條例中的末期病患與病人自主權。政治與社會哲學評論。41,45-91。
翁益強(2011)。探討「預立選擇安寧緩和醫療意願書」與「不施行心肺復甦術同意書」之差異。安寧照顧會訊。79,9-11。

被引用紀錄


蕭伃伶、劉芳、戈依莉(2020)。居家安寧療護之性別差異源遠護理14(2),11-17。https://doi.org/10.6530/YYN.202007_14(2).0002
李忞璇(2018)。樂齡醫療志工的生命意義與其簽署預立醫療指示意願之相關性〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DHPHE.001.2018.F02
林以容(2017)。生命末期醫療決策:訊息框架之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201701350
黃秀梅(2016)。臺北市公立安養護機構照顧工作人員執行安寧照顧經驗分享〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201602257
莊美琇、黃浩然、蕭秀鳳、紀夙芬、胡漢忠(2019)。社會行銷應用於推動安寧緩和醫療之探討長期照護雜誌23(2),149-164。https://doi.org/10.6317/LTC.201910_23(2).0005

延伸閱讀